Friday, August 31, 2007

WSJ speculators

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118851838516214091.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB118851838516214091.html

Investors played a big role in pumping up home prices during the housing boom. Now, they account for an outsize proportion of loan defaults, mortgage bankers and builders say.

A survey by the Mortgage Bankers Association found that mortgages on properties that aren't occupied by the owner -- mostly investment homes -- account for between 21% and 32% of the defaults on prime-quality home loans in Arizona, California, Florida and Nevada, states where overdue payments are mounting fast.

Defaults were high on both prime and subprime loans, those made to borrowers with shaky credit histories.

The four states were among the favorites of speculators during the housing boom. When the market was hot, many speculators bought homes hoping to flip them for a quick profit. But now that home prices have turned lower, that strategy is backfiring.

As a result, some investors have "simply walked away from their mortgages," said Doug Duncan, chief economist of the MBA, echoing recent comments from executives of Countrywide Financial Corp., the nation's largest mortgage lender.

Investor defaults are likely to add to the spate of foreclosed homes hitting the market over the next year or two, even as much tighter lending standards cut many potential buyers out of the market.

The darkening outlook for the housing sector has prompted economists at Goldman Sachs Group to predict that home prices nationwide will fall an average of about 7% both this year and next. Alarmed by such prospects, a group of top executives from home-building and supply companies are scheduled to meet next Wednesday with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke to argue for Fed actions to support the housing industry.

In Nevada, Arizona and Florida, loans for properties that weren't owner-occupied accounted for nearly a third of all home mortgages issued in 2005. The figure was 14% for California and 17% for the nation as a whole. The nationwide share for these primarily investor loans was in a range of about 5% to 7% in the 1990s, then jumped to 11% in 2002, 12% in 2003 and 15% in 2004.

In Nevada, homes that weren't occupied by the owner accounted for 32% of the prime-mortgage defaults recorded as of June 30, the MBA said. Such homes accounted for about a quarter of prime-loan defaults in Florida and Arizona and a fifth in California. For the nation as a whole, the figure was 16%.

The MBA defines defaults as loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the foreclosure process, but not those already taken over by lenders.

Sazzad Khandakar, 43 years old, an information-technology manager and father of three in Monroe Township, N.J., is among the nation's distressed home investors. In early 2005, he bought a $410,000 condominium and a $390,000 newly built single-family home, both in Orlando, Fla. "Everybody around me bought an investment home in Florida," Mr. Khandakar said. "Florida was all over the news; my friends were doing it....I didn't want to miss out."

He planned to keep the condo as a second home and sell the detached house for a quick profit. For the condo, Mr. Khandakar made a 10% down payment, but he borrowed 100% of the cost of the house, assuming that its rapid price appreciation would soon provide him with equity. Instead, prices began falling, and he has been unable to sell the home or find a tenant. Now, Mr. Khandakar said, he is behind on both loans.

"My credit is shot for the next six or seven years," he said, and he has run through $100,000 of retirement savings. "It will take me another five to 10 years to recover that," he added.

Many home builders say they tried to rein in sales to investors. Dom Cecere, chief financial officer of KB Home, a major national home builder based in Los Angeles, said his company used contractual clauses barring home owners from renting out their properties, but many investors bought anyway. "People do infiltrate whether you like it or not,'' he said.

Thanks to easy lending standards, many investors were able to get mortgages even though they put down deposits of as little as 2% to 3% on homes that weren't yet built. Some watched gleefully as a rising market boosted the value by 5% or 10% before the home was ready for occupancy. "For a while it went their way, they bought two or three homes and continued to roll the dice,'' said Mr. Cecere. "But that goes the other way when the prices go down.''

In the end, some investors may have made money by flipping a series of houses, and lost out only on their last investment, which they couldn't sell before the market collapsed, Mr. Cecere said.

Jerry Howard, chief executive of the National Association of Home Builders, said, "It's probably a pretty good bet" that the trade group will press the case for cutting interest rates when it and housing-industry executives meet with Mr. Bernanke on Wednesday.
[Walking Away]

On Aug. 17, in response to a credit crunch that grew out of problems in the markets for mortgage-linked securities, the Fed reduced its discount rate, the fee charged on direct Fed loans to banks, to 5.75% from 6.25%, in an effort to boost confidence amid near panic among investors over the surge in mortgage defaults and risks on other types of loans.

Markets are betting the Fed eventually will have to cut the more economically important federal-funds rate, charged on loans between banks, the benchmark for short-term borrowing costs. Lower rates tend to stimulate the economy by making it cheaper to borrow money.

Home prices are weak in most of the country largely because of a glut of houses and condos on the market. In July, the number of homes listed for sale nationwide was enough to last 9.6 months at the current sales rate, according to the National Association of Realtors. That's well above the five- to six-month supply that's considered balanced.

Meanwhile, lenders keep setting tougher terms, particularly for investors, who are viewed as higher-risk borrowers. Guidelines sent out to mortgage brokers last week by Countrywide specified that investors must make down payments of at least 20% on some types of loans and must document their income and assets. During the boom, many lenders provided 100% financing and often didn't insist on seeing the borrower's tax forms and pay stubs.

Underscoring the growing pessimism about housing, economists at Goldman Sachs in New York raised their forecast for the drop in U.S. home prices this year to 7% from a previous 5%. The forecast is based on the S&P/Case-Shiller national home-price index, considered the best such gauge by some housing economists. The Goldman economists expect a further 7% decline in house prices next year. In this year's second quarter, the index was down 3.2% from a year earlier.

Another house-price index, produced by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, or Ofheo, showed that prices in the second quarter were up 3.2% from a year earlier, the federal regulator announced yesterday. The Ofheo index, based on loans guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, excludes homes financed with mortgages above the current $417,000 limit of the two federally sponsored mortgage giants. As a result, it misses much of the market in California and other high-price areas. The Ofheo index has lagged other gauges in tracing the housing slump of the past two years.

Write to Michael Corkery at michael.corkery@wsj.com1 and James R. Hagerty at bob.hagerty@wsj.com2
URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118851838516214091.html

Hyperlinks in this Article:
(1) mailto:michael.corkery@wsj.com
(2) mailto:bob.hagerty@wsj.com


Copyright 2007 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

CA VCS

Ventura County Star


A credit crisis in the mortgage lending industry has aggravated an ailing housing market.

Buyers who were already nervous about taking a huge financial risk are now even more skittish, with experts predicting housing prices will fall further as inventory balloons.

This year's market outlook has deteriorated because of the credit difficulties precipitated by subprime lending, said Leslie Appleton-Young, chief economist of California Association of Realtors. As a result, transactions have dropped sharply.

Ventura County's sales fell 17.8 percent in July from the same month a year ago, CAR reported Monday. The median sales price for existing, single-family detached homes was $682,930, down 3.2 percent from $705,260 a year ago.

July's median dropped $9,800, or 1.4 percent, from June. The median is the midpoint, where half the homes sell for less and half for more.

Statewide, CAR's unsold inventory index rose to 10.7 months in July, up from 7.3 months for the same period a year ago. The index indicates the number of months needed to deplete the supply of homes on the market at the current sales pace. California's median rose 3.2 percent year over year to $586,030 in July.

The turmoil in the housing and financial sectors has a trickle-down effect across the economy, said Todd Cook, president of Debt.com, a Las Vegas consumer-oriented financial aggregator for the debt industry.

"The mortgage industry is a complete mess," Cook said. "Every day, there are more lenders shutting down, and more people going into foreclosure." The only people who are in good shape are those who have a conventional fixed-rate mortgage, he added.

Subprime loans hurt

The economy has been rocked by the downfall of mortgage companies, such as Calabasas-based Countrywide Financial Corp., a volatile stock market with triple-digit swings and a growing number of foreclosures.

Mortgage lenders were bitten by a tool they used to fuel the tremendous growth in the housing market — subprime loans for people with less than stellar credit and below-standard income.

The housing downturn affects many people, not just buyers and sellers.

People looking to refinance now face tougher lending standards. And as home values decline, homeowners have less equity to tap for big-ticket purchases or remodeling projects.

Concerns about the economy might trigger a reduction in consumer spending, which accounts for two-thirds of gross domestic product growth, a key economic indicator.

At this point, economists and even some real estate professionals say sellers should put their homes on the market only when they must.

While inventory remains high, the pool of buyers is shrinking, said Tony Deleo, a real estate broker at Main Street Realty in Ventura. Most people who have contacted Deleo haven't qualified for loans.

Many sellers are still unrealistic, believing that their homes can fetch the same prices the could two or three years ago, Deleo said. He estimates most of the houses on the market are 10 percent to 20 percent overpriced.

Naiveté among sellers is a real obstacle, he says.

"You're the messenger, and you're the one getting shot," Deleo said.

He tells his clients to list homes 5 percent below what similar homes have recently sold for. Deleo suggests lowering the price if the house doesn't sell within two to three weeks.

Dave Dennis, a Realtor with Re/Max Gold Coast Realty in Ventura, says most of his sellers are keeping their homes on the market because they don't think conditions will improve in the short term.

"This is a terrible time to sell," said Bill Watkins, executive director of the UC Santa Barbara Economic Forecast Project.

Still, Rose Vicente says she isn't worried. She and her husband, Manny, put their Simi Valley home on the market about two months ago, with plans to move to Texas by the end of the year.

The Vicentes recently reduced the price of their five-bedroom, 1,834-square-foot house by $50,000 to $599,900. They've since had plenty of calls, but mostly from investors offering much less than the asking price.

"We're not about to give it away," Manny said. "The house is almost paid for."

Rose says they will hold firm to the price.

"We're not in a big rush to sell," Rose said. "If it takes one to two months, it's OK. It's just a matter of waiting for the right person to buy."

Open house drew 40 people

Despite the gloomy picture, there does appear to be some buyers. Dennis of Re/Max said he had about 40 people come to one of his recent open houses, though they seemed to be very cautious.

Some economists project the market will rebound in late 2008 or 2009, and when it does, they forecast conservative, single-digit percentage increases of sales and prices.

Research firm Global Insight recently reported that California real estate prices will decline 16 percent, or about 20 percent after taking inflation into account, from earlier this year to a projected low point in 2009.

Watkins thinks the firm's projections are way too high for Ventura County, considering the economy's underlying fundamentals are strong — jobs are still increasing, unemployment rates remain low and durable goods purchases remain solid.

"I recognize the consumer sector is weaker than it's been, but most people still have jobs," Watkins said. "The trouble we have is in financial markets — Wall Street, not Main Street. In general, people are doing OK."

However, a sharp decline in local home values remains a possibility because of the turmoil at the county's two largest employers, he said.

Financial setbacks at Countrywide and Thousand Oaks-based Amgen Inc. could result in job losses, meaning there might be more homes for sale. That would put downward pressure on housing prices in the area, particularly in Thousand Oaks and Simi Valley, because of their proximity to the troubled companies, Watkins said.

Sellers are slowly coming to the realization that the market has softened, said Allen Reznick, president of the Conejo Valley Association of Realtors.

Reznick doesn't see panic among sellers yet, but concern has grown with the increase in foreclosures and "short sales" — when financial institutions accept less for the property than what is owed to avoid foreclosure.

Temple Schneider, a Realtor in Camarillo, says she is encouraging investors to buy.

"There are definitely deals," she said. "It's a buyer's market."

Schneider said she's been able to stay afloat by the friendships she has developed with clients. In July, she launched a chat site, AmericanAgentOnline.com, to help drum up business for herself and other agents.

The market's downturn has been hard, but "I'm surviving," she said. She's sold eight homes this year.
Comments

Monday, August 27, 2007

FL post

The Orlando Sentinel reports from Florida. "The champagne-popping days are over for Natalie and David Luongo, who banked enough money flipping a South Florida condo three years ago to stage a $100,000 wedding. Should they walk away from the $117,000 deposit they plunked down on another investment condo in the ritzy Miami-Dade enclave of Bal Harbour? Or should they close on the one-bedroom unit, which is similar to others now on the market for less than the $585,000 they agreed to pay?"


"'It's painful and scary,' Natalie Luongo said. 'We saw the frenzy, and we bought in. Now we're paying the consequences.'"


"Just how many other speculators face the same dilemma in the nation's most glutted condo market will become clear during the next two years. That is when 25,000 new condo units, most of them rising in or near Miami's downtown, will flood an area already saturated with 23,000 condos listed for sale. An additional 40,000 units have been approved, but analysts doubt the majority will break ground."


"(Consultants) warned that up to 70 percent of the condos rising in Miami were being snapped up by people who didn't plan to hold on to them, much less live in them. That was evident from the hordes who camped overnight, fought over lottery numbers, even paid homeless men $20 and a pack of cigarettes to hold their places in long lines, all for the chance to put 20 percent deposits on condos that existed only in brochures."


"The frenzy for some projects was so fevered that some developers raised their prices hourly."


"'It was a nightmare. Lines around the corner. People screaming into phones. I would look at them, and think, 'You don't know what you're doing,' said Mark Zilbert, president of Zilbert Realty Group."


"Gregg and Mary Mullins, retirees living near Fort Myers, finally rented out the two-story $885,500 penthouse they closed on last year in Blue, a concave tower overlooking Biscayne Bay. But the $2,800-a-month rent they're collecting is less than half their monthly mortgage payment, maintenance fees and property taxes."


"The couple never planned to live in the condo, but jumped at buying it at pre-construction prices in 2004 after friends shared a familiar story. 'They said they made lots of money, so they told us to try it and maybe we could make lots of money, too,' Mary Mullins said. 'But that didn't happen. We don't know what happened.'"


"A sheepish Tom Leon says he knows. The retired businessman from Illinois said he knew he had made a mistake about six months after he put down $200,000 on two $500,000 condos at the end of 2004."


"'Every 2 inches, I'd see another [construction] crane, and I knew: There is no market that can absorb these many units,' said Leon. 'It doesn't take a rocket scientist to say, 'Gee, who's going to live in all these buildings?'"


"After a more than five-year frenzy, the condo-building boom in downtown Orlando has ground to a halt. A new Orlando Sentinel survey of the downtown core finds that more than two-thirds of the 40 new high- and mid-rise condo projects announced in recent years are in limbo."


"Not a single project has broken ground since an identical Sentinel survey six months ago found only 15 of the 40 projects had begun construction or been completed. Scott Stahley, a senior VP at Lincoln Property Co., calls the current condo environment 'scary.' 'It cannot be done,' said Stahley."


"The projects that have yet to get out of the ground may be the lucky ones. Many developers say the condo market has fallen so precipitously that the true danger now lies with the handful of still-incomplete towers that have already passed the point of no return."


"A number of developers are in a situation some say is the worst-case scenario: halfway built. Five downtown condo towers are in the midst of construction right now, including the 100-unit Star Tower and the 146-unit 101 Eola. The other three are giants."


"Developers make no secret that they will be anxiously watching to see how the newest projects perform. 'I think everybody is in the search mode: How many investors are there?' said Michael Beale, of Raleigh, N.C.-based Highwoods Properties, which has a 125-unit downtown condo project on hold and another in early planning stages."


"'We were all hoping it was like 80 percent owner-occupied and 20 percent investors,' he said. 'But no one knows.'"


The Palm Beach Post. "After 14 months, Pam Crosby finally blinked. The former morning news anchor put her Lake Worth home on the market on June 9, 2006. 'I had been told for the past two years I could get all this money for it, and then I went to have it appraised, and it appraised high - $260,000 to $280,000,' she said. 'Then the bottom fell out.'"


"Despite being listed with a widely respected Realtor, the two-bedroom, one-bath house was shown only five times in 14 months, she said. There were no offers."


"The supply of single-family homes and condominium units for sale in Palm Beach County's MLS reached 32 months' worth in June in the $200,000-$299,999 price range, according to Illustrated Properties Real Estate."


"In the $300,000-$499,999 range, which has included the county's median price since the boom times, sales declined 73 percent from June 2006 to June of this year. And it would take 37 months to burn off the supply."


"In Palm Beach County, 1,142 homeowners lost their bid for the American dream - or their investment flip - compared with 370 foreclosures in the same month a year ago, the Palm Beach County clerk's office said. It was worse in St. Lucie County, where 429 homeowners got foreclosure notices last month - nearly five times as many as in July 2006, when 90 were filed, according to the clerk's office."


"After getting nary a nibble on her home for more than a year, Crosby lowered her asking price from the original $260,000 to $156,000. She decided to sell the 800-square-foot house herself, a challenging task for an out-of-town owner. If Crosby can't sell the house, she said, she'll rent it."


"'My sellers are sticking to their guns in pricing,' said Douglas Rill, president of Century 21 America's Choice. How are sales? 'Slow,' he said."


"'One client - a famous guy, but I can't tell you who he is - thinks, 'Well, it will sell now or it will sell next year,' Rill said. 'But he really can't hold out because he has a $1 million mortgage. He moved to North Carolina, so he's going to lose his homestead.'"


'"When that sticker shock comes up and his taxes are $75,000 instead of $7,500, then I think in November or December when the tax bill comes, price is going to matter. When it's costing him $15,000 a month, it's going to matter,' he said."


The St Petersburg Times. "Bleak headlines say the home building industry has sunk into its worst trough in a decade. With sympathies to laid-off construction workers and model home sales staff, three cheers for the trough. It's good news for Tampa Bay area homeowners."


"In our region the big picture depicts a glut the size of Goliath. In July, of 41,000 homes for sale in Pinellas, Pasco and Hillsborough counties, about 2,400 sold. With so many homes competing for so few buyers, a house sells for about 10 to 20 percent less than it would have 18 months ago."


"Aside from sellers yanking their home listings to await better days, the market needs builders to give it a rest."


The Ledger. "Foreclosures filed for single-family homes in Polk in 2007 totaled 1,696 through July, nearly doubling 2006's total of 998, according to data collected by Largo-based Foreclosures Daily. And there's still another five months to tally."


"Tracy Beebe, a manager in Polk County's Circuit Court's civil division, spoke with several real-estate lawyers who estimate thousands of foreclosures are waiting to be filed around the state."


"Chris Osmon, who owns AAA Housebuyers LLC, hasn't found any deals. 'It's a down market right now,' said the Lakeland investor. 'No one is bidding because the homes are at 100 percent of their value or greater and the banks don't want to take a loss. It makes no sense as an investor to bid on those properties.'"


"At the auction last week, properties were sold within a matter of minutes, sometimes seconds. But only the lenders foreclosing on the property were bidding."


"Polk's median home sales price has increased 96 percent from $89,000 in 2002 to $175,300 in June. Across Florida, median property values increased 76 percent during that time from $137,800 to $243,200."


"The rise in prices helped fuel a craze among buyers hoping to get into a new home, investors wanting to make quick cash and lenders looking to make money off new mortgages. 'The less you understand and know, the more money they make,' Jeff Lazerson, CEO of a mortgage broker in Laguna Niguel, Calif., said of mortgage lenders."


"That is what has helped fuel the current foreclosure situation around the country. 'Many of the lenders were loose or had no standards for underwriting,' he said. 'You could be dead and get a loan.'"


The Herald Tribune. "Sarasota Realtors coined a new slogan in January: Time2Buy. One of these days they may be right, experts say. Those willing and able to buy can take their pick, make low-ball offers without fear of derision and wait for a seller to take the bait."


"But though it is easy to make a buy now, not all the experts agree that it is the right thing to do."


"'Prices definitely have declined, especially in areas like yours,' said Susan Wachter,a professor of real estate at the Wharton School in Philadelphia. 'You are in the epicenter of the subprime-induced bubble.'"


"In July 2005, a Sarasota buyer would have found just 1,626 active single-family listings, a mere 10 weeks' worth of inventory. Realtors were closing on 156 deals per week. This summer, that would-be buyer has 8,135 homes to consider. At the current sales rate of 90 houses a week, that inventory will last 90 weeks."


"'We are in a holding pattern, because we haven't seen the bottom yet,' said George Huhn, founder of Gulf2Golf Properties in Venice. 'There may be another 20 percent, 30 percent on the downside on this thing.'"


"'Everybody wants to know when will we get out of trouble,' said Sarasota banker Jody Hudgins. 'In January of '06, people were saying, 'Sometime in the spring and summer of 2007.' Well, that has come and gone, and what are we saying now?'"


"As chief economist at Wachovia Bank, Mark Vitner of Charlotte, N.C., has a unique vantage point on the construction-related economy in the Southeast. He claims to know the executives of every major builder in the region." "In Vitner's view, the nation is roughly halfway through a two-year-long correction in existing home prices, which started in third quarter 2006."


"'We are in the early stages of a buyer's market, because there are more sellers than buyers. But sellers really haven't come off their prices enough to make it attractive to the buyers,' he said."

CA more house

Modesto Bee


Well, you can't complain about lack of variety.

Northern San Joaquin Valley home buyers these days have a staggering selection of homes in all sizes, prices and styles.

Modesto newcomer Kevin Schinmann called the choices overwhelming: "It was like going to a restaurant with a menu that listed 14 pages of unbelievable food."

If all the homes for sale in Modesto were crammed on a menu, it probably would be several inches thick and weigh a couple of pounds. A recent search of Realtor.com showed 2,273 single-family homes; 197 condos and town homes; and 131 mobile homes for sale in Modesto.

Modesto properties range from a tiny two-bedroom, one-bath house for $159,000 to a new three-story estate with 9,500 square feet of living space for $3.5 million.

There are houses on golf courses, lakes, rivers and small ranches. Some are century-old classics with big back yards. Others are energy-efficient tract homes with high-tech wiring on tiny lots.

More than 200 new homes are completed and waiting for buyers in about 77 subdivisions across Stanislaus County.

All those housing options made it tough for Schinmann to pick the perfect home for his family. His auto industry job transferred him from Chicago to Modesto this spring, so he was unfamiliar with the region and surprised by the selection.

"When there's so much to choose from, you kind of get gun-shy," Schinmann said, "because you know there's always going to be something else to look at."

And look he did. During his three-month search, Schinmann studied a couple of hundred Internet listings and toured about 40 homes.

"We ended up buying the very first house we had looked at online when we were back in Chicago," Schinmann said. But between the time he initially spotted that Bayview Drive house and the day he bought it, he said, "the price dropped $130,000."

It's been that kind of market. Prices for new and used homes have been dropping as inventory has soared. Median sales prices are down more than 13 percent since last summer and sales volume has plunged about 45 percent.

That's good news for shoppers.

"They really have the best of all worlds because they have good selection and good bar- gaining power," said Randy Feldhaus, an agent for PMZ Real Estate.

Easier to find your price range

Two years ago at the real estate market's peak, Feldhaus said, it was difficult for buyers to find homes in their price range.

"It used to be if someone called and wanted a home for under $300,000, it was hard to help them," Feldhaus recalled.

Now about 1,000 Modesto homes are priced at or below $300,000.

New homes, too, can be found for that price in Modesto and in several cities across the Northern San Joaquin Valley.

In Manteca, Florsheim Homes opened a development last month with single-family home prices starting at $295,000. Those Valley Blossom houses are as small as 1,200 square feet, which was a difficult-to-find size during the building boom years from 2000 to 2005.

"We're building a lot of smaller homes with smaller price points now," said Joe Anfuso, who runs Florsheim Homes, a Stockton-based devel- oper.

Anfuso said there's a nation- wide credit crunch making it harder for buyers to qualify for mortgages, so builders must adjust their offerings to make homes more affordable.

"You've got to give buyers what they require to get them to even consider your houses," Anfuso explained. So not only are prices coming down, but homes also are being built with more amenities, more energy-efficient features and more high-tech options. "You're getting more house for your money," he said.

That's a big switch from a few years ago when new home buyers had to camp out in line for the chance to buy a house -- any house -- from a builder. Back in 2003, for example, about 75 people lined up for the grand opening of Florsheim's Rose Classics in Turlock.

Sales are much harder to come by these days.

"Price point is the most im- portant thing right now," said Jim Lawrence, a Century 21 M&M and Associates agent who markets the new Sunset Meadows duets in Oakdale. The four-bedroom homes are priced as low as $281,950. Duets are two homes that share a single wall but are built on separately owned lots.

Such condos and town houses rarely were built during the boom years. But now housing variety is expanding continually as builders try to reduce land costs by increasing density.

Small lot developments popular

That trend will continue, predicted Stephen Smiley, senior managing director of Hanley Wood Market Intelligence, which does research and market analysis for builders.

"You're going to start seeing a lot more high-density detached housing," said Smiley, noting the increasing popularity of small-lot developments. "The days of the 6,000- and 7,000- square-foot lots are gone."

Smiley said downtown condo developments are on the drawing boards for several Northern San Joaquin Valley cities.

"We're working with a client who wants to build a nice high-end condo project in downtown Modesto in the next year or two," said Smiley, explaining that there could be retail shops on the ground floor and residential units above.

Adding more housing choices to the mix, however, may not make buying decisions easier.

Schinmann said if he had it to do over again, he wouldn't have toured so many homes. He doesn't advise others to do what he did.

"If you find a house you ab- solutely love in your price range, buy it," Schinmann said. "I wouldn't look at the other 40 houses."

Bee staff writer J.N. Sbranti can be reached at jnsbranti@modbee.com or

Sunday, August 26, 2007

CA marin

Marin Independent


Jonas and Tammy Hedberg are paying extra for their new home, just to be safe.

Described by their broker as "rock-solid borrowers with great credit," the Greenbrae couple - first-time homebuyers with 6-year-old twin boys - didn't want to lose the $1.1 million house amid a crazed credit crunch. They closed escrow about eight days early, and will pay an extra $1,800 to $2,000 in interest because of that.

"The thing is, once we signed all the papers in escrow I thought we were done," said Hedberg, senior director of sales operations for a San Jose-based storage company.

"I didn't understand initially that that wasn't the case - that they could pull (the funding) at any time," he said of the lender. "The chances were slim that it would happen, but for a few days of interest it's well worth the insurance. É The downside is huge."

In Marin, the national mortgage meltdown has done lots more than just make buyers like the Hedbergs anxious - it has cost hundreds of mortgage industry and other housing-related jobs, kept houses on the market longer and boosted the county's foreclosure rate.

Last week, Novato-based mortgage lender GreenPoint was shuttered, eliminating the jobs of 430 Marin workers - the most recent in a series
Advertisement
of job cuts at Marin mortgage companies in recent months. A week earlier, Restoration Hardware, citing the decline in the national housing market, announced it would cut 100 jobs at its Corte Madera headquarters.

Foreclosures in Marin have risen sharply since last year, jumping from two in July 2006 to 11 in July of this year, although the county's numbers - when compared with the Bay Area and the nation - are still the envy of the region.

The number of foreclosure filings reported in the
Jonas and Tammy Hedberg move a stereo cabinet from the garage into their recently purchased home in Greenbrae last week. They closed escrow early to ensure their loan came through amid the lending market volatility. (IJ photo/Jeff Vendsel)
U.S. last month jumped 93 percent from July 2006 and rose 9 percent from June, the latest sign that homeowners are having trouble making payments and finding buyers during the national housing downturn.

The fallout comes after a nationwide five-year housing boom turned to bust last year. The combination of higher interest rates and weaker home values have clobbered homeowners, especially those with higher-risk "subprime" mortgages. Mounting defaults have forced some lenders out of business. Credit problems have spread to other borrowers. Nervous lenders have tightened standards, making it harder for individuals and companies to obtain credit - the lifeblood of the economy.

The Marin real estate market is weathering the storm, although borrowers and home sellers are feeling the pinch, real estate and lending experts said.

"You're a very small elite market, so you're certainly not representative of the state as a whole," Leslie Appleton-Young, the chief economist for the California
Association of Realtors, said of Marin.

Still, she said: "No one is immune from what's happening in the marketplace right now. No one."

Marin's median single-family home price fell to $950,000 last month, higher than this time last year but below last month's record $1.125 million. The median is the point at which half the homes cost more and half cost less. In April, the county's median single-family home price hit $1,010,000 - the first time any California county broke the seven-figure barrier - before slipping to $925,000 in May.

"The real estate industry is cyclical, particularly with the crisis with the lenders," said Valerie Castellana, president of the Marin Association of Realtors. "They're taking some steps backwards, but we expect it will normalize over time. It's just a matter of when they will normalize."

While rates have remained largely unchanged in conforming loans, jumbo loans, notes over $417,000 not backed by the federal government, are more expensive. About 80 percent of Marin's borrowers hold jumbo loans, real estate officials said.

Nationally, lagging home sales and flat or decreasing home prices have made it more difficult for homeowners who fall behind on payments to sell their homes and clear the debt, spurring the rise in foreclosure activity.

Loan types seeing higher delinquencies and defaults in general are home equity loans or second mortgages used to cover a down payment, subprime loans to people with shaky credit histories, and Alt-A loans, which can include interest-only and adjustable rate mortgages sold with little or no documentation.

In California, the expectation is the foreclosure numbers will get worse before improving, the California Association of Realtor's Appleton-Young said.

At Charlie Christensen's Sausalito brokerage, CWC Financial, some clients are feeling the pressure. Several, like the Hedbergs, have closed escrow early.

"It's very dicey out there - it's unprecedented," he said. "It's going to be tougher for people to qualify for new loans."

"We're kind of on an island here," he said of Marin. "It may not be as bad as it is in some other places, but I think it's going to be a little worse than people think unless the Fed steps in and takes some radical steps."

Tighter restrictions have affected both mortgage brokers and retail lenders, who offer loans from a single source, rather than shopping a borrower around.

"It's touched us a lot," said Lee Aubry, a mortgage consultant with Wells Fargo Bank. "The bottom line is, cheap, easy loans are becoming very quickly a thing of the past.

"Lenders are basically going to be more conservative," Aubry said. "This is going to take years. Now more than ever people will need down payments - they'll need good credit."

"You just have to be a lot smarter now," said Nick Cooper, a founding agent with Vision Real Estate in Corte Madera. "Money isn't as cheap as it was. If you look historically, it's still cheap. We got so spoiled."

Houses are selling, he said, especially at the higher end of the market. Proper pricing is key, he said, pointing to a San Anselmo teardown that was reported last week to have 14 offers.

"I would say it is making people more on edge," he said. "(Properties) are slower to move, but É you're not seeing this downturn. It's a great time for entry-level buyers if you have the money and the credit - it's an ideal time."

Hoping to help buyers caught in the crunch, some skittish sellers are putting up money, hoping to bridge the financial divide to close the deal. It's not something you see often in Marin, agents said.

"We haven't seen seller financing in 10 years," said Kathy Schlegel of Lucas Valley Properties.

The situation will lead to positive reform, experts said.

"It was so unrealistic to have the money so easily available," said Bill McKeon, a broker associate at Pacific Union Real Estate in Greenbrae. "That's what everyone's talking about. It was very common to have zero-down purchases É a lot based on stated income, and that was bound to end. I think what's catching everyone by surprise is how abruptly it ended."

"As ugly as this is, it's going to shake down the unscrupulous lenders," said mortgage broker Lisa MacLean-Fonarow of Larkspur-based All California Mortgage.

"The end result is it's not going to be better for the lenders to have practices like this. It's going to be better for the consumer."

Money is still out there, albeit at a higher price. "What is important É is to find lenders or brokers who do not sell their loans on Wall Street," Christensen said. "I think it's going to take a couple of years to correct itself, but I don't think we're going to go back to the lending practices of the last five years."

Creative solutions exist, brokers said.

"I had a client, his credit was 696, and we locked him on a program that only required him a 660," MacLean-Fonarow said. Credit scores, used to determine the likelihood borrows will pay debts, are based on payment history, debt owned, length of credit history, new credit and types of credit used. The higher the scores - which can range from 300 to 850 - the lower the risk.

"Overnight it (loan terms) changed to a 700 - my client was four points away," she said. "I'm a mortgage broker É I can take him somewhere else and he could have paid a little more for it. (Instead) we perused the credit score and found those four points."

MacLean-Fonarow and her client linked the four points to an open credit card account. The client closed the account, obtained a letter from the creditor indicating the debt was settled, and got his score changed to qualify for the cheaper loan, she said.

"We had to play some games, but it still worked," she said.

Like all corrections, this one shall pass, Christensen said.

"I think people need to take a deep breath and let this thing settle out," he said. "There's a correction occurring. Some people are going to lose their homes, some in Marin.

"Is it going to be biblical proportions? I don't think so."

Contact Jennifer Upshaw via e-mail at jupshaw@marinij.com; the Associated Press contributed to this report.
Print Email Return t

Saturday, August 25, 2007

CA condos WSJ

Wall Street Journal


For the nation's real-estate lenders, the other shoe may be about to drop: condominiums.

Already plagued by rising home-loan defaults and foreclosures among overstretched consumers, major markets across the country -- including parts of Florida, California and Washington, D.C. -- are seeing rising foreclosures and bankruptcies of entire condo projects.
[Flodding the Market]

The problems are emerging as some buyers who signed contracts to buy new condos two to three years ago, when construction was just starting, seek ways to back out as they encounter trouble getting financing in the suddenly dicey mortgage market. Falling prices are forcing appraisals down, so banks aren't willing to lend the full amounts that people committed to in the sales contract.

"Closings that are scheduled to take place are not taking place," says Marvin Moss, a North Miami Beach real-estate attorney. He is suing several developers to help clients get out of contracts.

The condo market, while tied to the housing market overall, behaves differently under stress. While a single-family home builder generally constructs units as orders come in, a condo developer builds all at once and hopes for the best, adding risk. So while the speculative overhang of newly constructed single-family homes may have peaked in many markets across the country, the full force of the condo glut is starting to hit now.

With single-family homes, "you put up a couple of model homes and build the rest as you get sales contracts." says James Haughey, director of research at Reed Construction Data in Norcross, Ga. "But you have to build the entire...building before you can sell a single condo."

In 2006, the number of new condominium units completed jumped 145% to 102,800, from 41,900 in 2003, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Last year was the highest level since 1985, when 135,800 units were built. So far this year, 48,354 units have been built and another 72,000 are under construction, according to New York research firm Reis Inc.

Downtown San Diego can expect 2,900 new units to arrive on the market in the next year, according to real-estate investment brokerage Marcus & Millichap. Hessam Nadji, a managing director at the Encino, Calif., firm, estimates it will take as long as 18 to 24 months for the most-saturated markets to buy up the glut of condo inventory -- if the economy overall stays strong.

Miami is in worse shape: The city added 4,549 condo units in 2006 and 3,276 so far this year. Another 7,985 will be delivered by the end of the year, with another 8,260 slated for 2008 to 2011, according to Reis, for a grand total of 24,070 news units between 2006 and 2011.

"More of the iceberg is being revealed, but we haven't seen it all yet," says Norman Radow, an Atlanta real-estate investor who works with lenders to rescue distressed condo complexes.
MORE

• Complete Coverage: Debt Dilemmas

Typically, condo developers are required to pay off construction loans shortly after construction is completed. But with sales stalled, more developers are defaulting, creating headaches for banks and real-estate funds that financed the projects.

The percentage of bank construction loans overall that are in default has risen to 2.3% in the second quarter of 2007 from 1.0% at the end of 2005 . "Condos are a significant share of defaults and delinquencies going on," says Matthew Anderson of Foresight Analytics, an Oakland, Calif., research firm. His analysis shows condo lending ballooned to $31.3 billion in 2006 from $8.4 billion in 2003. These figures don't include the large amounts flowing into condos from hedge funds and investment banks.

One of the biggest condo lenders, Chicago's Corus Bankshares, has seen its $3.7 billion portfolio of condo loans deteriorate. The value of the bank's nonperforming assets has skyrocketed to $242 million in the quarter ended June 30 from $620,000 a year ago. The bank continues to be profitable, and made three new condo loans worth $400 million, though it predicts darker times are ahead. "It would not surprise us to see an even greater impact on earnings over the next several quarters, or even years, depending on when the market improves," Chief Executive Robert Glickman said in a note to shareholders.

The failures so far have been concentrated among developers that bought land -- or existing rental apartments to convert to condos -- at the top of the market in late 2005 or early 2006. The worst collapses have so far involved condo conversions. Developer Triton Real Estate Partners of Annapolis, Md., bought a Rockville, Md., complex known as the Pavilion in November 2005 for $117 million, with plans to pump in $30 million to upgrade and sell the units. There are 434 units, so the average price it paid was $271,000 a unit. Triton changed the name to the Monterey and offered the one- to three-bedroom units for $300,000 to $500,000.

The sales didn't materialize and Triton failed to pay its lender, CBRE Realty Finance of Hartford, Conn., which foreclosed on the property in May. With the sales market on the rocks, the lender had to write down the project's value by $7.8 million, forcing the company to record a $4.6 million loss in the second quarter. The commercial-property lender, incorporated as a real-estate investment trust, has stopped making new investments and almost missed a $17 million payment on a line of credit from Wachovia Corp. It hopes to restart the sales program at the Monterey complex shortly.

Triton and CBRE declined to comment.

Buyer's remorse is also causing problems for some developers. Cindy Cicala plunked down a 10% deposit on a $370,000 two-bedroom condo in a new project in Tampa, Fla., in August 2004 -- a time when investors were elbowing each other aside to sign contracts. The site was particularly attractive to Ms. Cicala because, in addition to superb views, her unit was to be finished by August 2006, making it one of the first high-rise residences to be built in the city's reviving downtown.

But in April, 2005, the developer asked for an extension. "It was just one delay after another," says Ms. Cicala, a 51-year-old residential-mortgage broker. She decided she didn't want to close on the condo, claiming the developer hadn't held up its end of the contract. Ms. Cicala says she asked for her deposit back but hasn't received it, so she sued under a federal law that guarantees condos must be delivered within two years unless the developer can prove certain extenuating circumstances.

Her attorney, Harry Lee Coe IV, says Ms. Cicala and other clients "are seeing their investing potential has dwindled, and they are now no longer at the front of the pack -- and you don't want to be in the middle of the pack in a bad or down market."

Left holding the bag amid the defaults and foreclosures are the banks and real-estate investment funds that lent money to people such as Farbod Zohouri, an Atlanta developer who took out $300 million in loans for more than a dozen projects in 2005 and 2006. Within a year, all were foreclosed or had filed for bankruptcy protection.

In a sign of how widespread the condo frenzy was among lenders, Mr. Zohouri's financing sources ranged from tiny local banks to Lehman Brothers, which lent him $180 million for two Orlando condo-conversion projects that flopped. Several commercial banks lent him money for five projects, despite his relatively small operation and spotty track record, which included a settlement with the federal government on mortgage-kickback allegations.

Mr. Zohouri, who goes by "Fred," says he is "an honest person" who is working hard to get his investors' money back. He says because of possible legal actions, he can't explain exactly what went wrong.

Underlying the defaults was a loosening of lending standards. In the past, wary of the high risks posed by condo sales, lenders such as commercial banks would give money to condo projects with the understanding that if the condos didn't sell, the developer could rent them and still repay the loan. That would limit the amount banks would lend, because the cash from renting units is slow and steady and can cover a smaller amount of debt than the amount generated by selling all units within a year of completion, as most condo projects aim to do.

But in the latest boom, a host of nonbank lenders began throwing cash at condo projects, allowing developers to pay prices for land and buildings such that they could pay back the loans only if the units sold at high prices.

Mr. Radow, the Atlanta real-estate investor, says troubles in the condo market stem from the proliferation of new players in the real-estate finance world, many of whom never went through bad times. Before the condo boom, there were only about a dozen major sources of equity or mezzanine debt, the riskiest -- and potentially most rewarding -- parts of real-estate finance. In past five years hedge funds, real-estate funds, private equity and community banks all got into the act.

"Who are managing all the funds?" Mr. Radow asks. "Where did all the real-estate experts come from?"

--Jennifer S. Forsythe contributed to this article.

Write to Alex Frangos at alex.frangos@wsj.com
RELATED ARTICLES AND BLOGS
Related Content may require a subscription | Subscribe Now -- Get 2 Weeks FREE
Related Articles from the Online Journal
• Investors Yield to Profit Potential of Ukraine
Blog Posts About This Topic
• Toronto condo market shows no signs of slowing jeffreyteam.com
• More of the iceberg? dinocrat.com
More related content Powered by Sphere
Click to format this article for printing Click to format this article for printing View a list of most popular articles on our site Find out about distributing multiple copies of this article Find out about distributing multiple copies of this article
Sponsored by

Return To Top
Subscribe Log In Take a Tour Contact Us Help Email Setup Customer Service: Online | Print
Privacy Policy Subscriber Agreement & Terms of Use Mobile Devices RSS Feeds
News Licensing Advertising About Dow Jones
Copyright © 2007 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
DowJones

Monday, August 20, 2007

CA mercury news 8.20

Mercury News

At Mountain House, visionaries carefully planned streets, schools, sewers - everything needed to create a thriving community of 16,000 homes in the middle of San Joaquin County's farmland.

Build it and they will come. And they did.

Starting in 2003, thousands of Silicon Valley residents desperate for a house, two-car garage and back yard made the hour-plus commute from the job-rich Bay Area over the Altamont Pass to Mountain House, where home prices started in the low $300,000s.

But then the real estate boom went bust. Last month, DataQuick reported that San Joaquin County mortgage holders were among the most likely in the state to default on their payments; San Joaquin County has the highest foreclosure rate among the nation's 100 largest metropolitan areas, RealtyTrac recently reported.

Mountain House, where Bay Area transplants are 80 percent of the population, is a dramatic illustration of a development that was built as a solution to Silicon Valley's overpriced housing market. Now, it finds itself hurt by high gas prices, ever-worsening commutes and a growing desire among South Bay residents for housing close to Silicon Valley jobs - even if it's condominiums and townhouses.

The trend of building high-density housing projects in the Bay Area's urban communities has taken off in the past several years, the result of land-use policies that allowed developers to build condos and townhomes on former industrial property. This option
Advertisement
wasn't widely available when buyers began moving to Mountain House.

It's all taken a toll.

"It is as bad as it looks," said Susan Patteson, an agent with Fox Realty and a Mountain House resident since late 2003. "Homes that two years ago sold at the peak of the market now sell for $200,000 less. We rode the high; now we're suffering the low."

Just four years into the development, about 6,000 residents live in roughly 2,000 homes. Of those, about 60 are in foreclosure, according to Sean O'Toole, founder of ForeclosureRadar.

Yet the major home builders at Mountain House - Pulte, Lennar, Centex and now Shea Homes - say the community is one of their best-performing markets. Given the Central Valley market, where sales are off by more than one-third compared with a year ago, according to the Ryness Report, that's not saying much.

Trouble signs

A sure sign of decline at Mountain House is a dying lawn. A closer look reveals trash, ad fliers shoved under the door, and the clincher: a foreclosure notice or, worse, auction announcement, taped to the window.

These are the same homes that in 2004, 2005 and as late as June 2006 were sold by lottery to crowds of 300
pre-qualified buyers, many of whom camped overnight just for the chance to own a home.

Now they're languishing in a weak housing market.

"The loans are worth more than the house," said Jim Lamb, a Realtor who lives in Mountain House.

Real estate agents say buyers are reluctant to move to outlying regions such as Mountain House and nearby Tracy because homes that had appreciated as much as 25 percent a year are no longer holding their value.

But Paul Sensibaugh, head of the Mountain House community services district, said residents are still very happy with their community and its highly rated school - even if it still lacks a grocery store and companies haven't arrived bringing jobs.

The biggest problem for home sellers in Mountain House is they must compete with brand-new houses still going up. Meanwhile, builders are slashing prices, offering upgrades at little or no cost, and promising to fix anything that goes wrong with the house in the first year. Some builders are even doubling buyers' real estate agents' commission to a previously unheard-of 6 percent.

"You've really got to be in love with a used house to buy it instead of a new house," Lamb said. "People who are here long term will do great. They bought beautiful houses in nice neighborhoods. The real estate market won't stay bad for more than 10 years."

Among the homeowners who are hurting is John Basso, a project manager for Applied Materials. Basso paid $503,000, and spent more than $100,000 on upgrades and a pool.

Basso sold his townhome in Sunnyvale in 2003 and bought a 3,000-plus-square-foot dream house for his family. He and his wife, Yvette, and three children loved the new community, especially the new school. His commute was eased by taking the Altamont Commuter Express train, and the family settled in for the long haul.

"We upgraded our house significantly. We put in a swimming pool with the solar heat and a five-foot-high waterfall," he said. "The only reason was because we had every intention of staying there."

Then earlier this year, Basso was transferred to Austin. The house went on the market in June for $675,000, then $649,950, and now it's dropped to $624,950. "We're not trying to get every dollar out of it," he said. "We're just trying to complete the transaction."

The same can be said by the home builders - all publicly owned except Shea - that are doing what it takes to sell their houses. Pulte, Centex and Lennar are multibillion-dollar companies with deep pockets that presumably can ride out the downturn, as they have in previous cycles.

`Difficult market'

"It is a difficult market for all of us," said Les Lifter, Lennar's vice president of marketing. But, "considering the market, we're still having sales."

Kevin Peters, managing director of Shea Mountain House, said there's no question that 2007 has seen significantly fewer sales than 2006. But, he said, "It's a cyclical business. This is a long-term project. While it's not the most fun time to be in the market, there's not a better project to be associated with."

Nonetheless, building has slowed in Mountain House. Only 577 permits were issued from July 2006 to June 2007 compared with 837 permits taken out from July 2005 to June 2006.

With a glut of houses on the market, why are they building at all? The developers have little choice. They paid millions of dollars to buy the home sites and are obligated to pay for the streets, sewers, water treatment plants and schools before houses can be built. The only way to recoup their costs is to sell homes.

While experts believe the Bay Area housing market will be rocky for the next three years, they aren't guessing how long it will last in the Central Valley, where builders simply have constructed too many houses.

As far as Mountain House resident and Realtor Patteson is concerned, it's a no-win situation.

"If they stop building, the town stops growing. If they continue building, our resales are low," she said. "The market will come back. I would hate to see progress stop on behalf of the resale market. We need our community built."

Contact Katherine Conrad at kconrad@mercurynews.com or (408) 920-5073.
RePrintPrint Email Return to Top
Comments
The Mercury News is pleased to let readers post comments about an article at the end of the article. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your full name and city when commenting.
NOTE: Links are not permitted in article comments


Recent Comments

* Love your REALTOR.
* I visited the Tracy communities a couple years ago - and it was the...
* "The real estate market won't stay bad for more than 10 years."That...

»Read More

Post Your Comment
Name:
Local News

* crime
* politics
* obituaries


# San Jose may spend $700,000 to move Cirque show downtown
# Men fight after robbery in Santa Cruz
# San Jose forum pushes health

Thursday, August 16, 2007

CA OC wsj

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118722072707499017.html?mod=hpp_us_personal_journal


FULLERTON, Calif. -- Nearly two years ago, Mario and Leticia Montes found a home they loved, a gray stucco bungalow with a hot tub in the backyard in a middle-class neighborhood of Orange County.

The price was a major stretch at $567,000. But the couple, who had sold a home a few years earlier to move to a better area, was tired of renting. Mr. and Mrs. Montes convened a meeting with their two teenage daughters around the kitchen table to hash out the implications. "We agreed we wanted to be homeowners again," says Mr. Montes, "even if it meant the end of vacations and not eating out as often."
[Go to the Question of the Day.]1 QUESTION OF THE DAY

• Discuss: How much equity do you estimate you have in your home?2

Like many people who jumped into the rising housing market in recent years, they had little money for a down payment and chose a loan that would hold their monthly payments down for the first two years, then "reset" to a much higher level. Mr. and Mrs. Montes say their mortgage broker assured them they would be able to refinance in a couple of years to keep their payments affordable.

With a December "reset" on their loan looming, however, the refinancing option now looks impossible. A friend who works as a loan officer called with some bad news this week: Similar homes in their area have been selling for $535,000 to $565,000 recently. That means the Monteses' loan balance may exceed the value of their home.

The Monteses are caught in a trap -- one that hundreds of thousands of people could face as the housing market totters and the easy credit of recent years dries up. They in effect bet that the boom in housing prices would continue. It was more important to hop onto the escalator than to wait until they could afford to make the leap according to traditional measures.

And with thousands of mortgage banks and brokers threatened with extinction, lenders that embraced all kinds of risky loans two years ago are enforcing increasingly strict standards. They are refusing even to consider extending new credit to people like the Monteses who lack any equity in their homes.
A BET TURNS SOUR

• Taking the Plunge: With little savings and so-so credit, the Monteses took out a subprime loan to buy a California bungalow for $567,000.
• The Trouble: As the day nears when their mortgage will 'reset' to a higher rate, refinancing rules have tightened.
• What's Next: With no equity, the family seems unlikely to get a new loan and may lose the home.

"We have a disaster on our hands," says Mr. Montes, a 48-year-old warehouse manager. He fears he won't be able to handle the payments after the December reset and wonders whether the family can avert foreclosure. "At this point," he says, "we really don't have a plan."

Until recently, the Montes family didn't seem like the type that would find itself faced with foreclosure. They live in a solid neighborhood and are both employed and in good health. "My wife and I make pretty good money," says Mr. Montes. Mrs. Montes works as a school secretary. Together, they earned nearly $90,000 last year.

But they already pay about $38,400 a year on their home loans, even before taxes and insurance. In December, when their primary loan "resets" to a higher rate, that cost will rise to about $50,000 a year, Mr. Montes says.

Tightening Standards

Lenders have been tightening their standards for the past year in the face of rising defaults and growing jitters among the investors who provide funding for loans. That tightening has accelerated in the past two weeks as many lenders -- uncertain at what price they might be able to sell loans -- have stopped making all but the safest ones.

"It's getting worse and worse," says Jeff Lazerson, chief executive of Mortgage Grader, a mortgage broker in Laguna Niguel, who tried to help the Montes family last spring but concluded even then that they couldn't qualify for a new loan. Many people who have been counting on a refinancing to ease their debt burdens will find that's now impossible, he says: "It's either work 24 hours a day to make ends meet [with the existing loan] or mail the keys back to the bank."
[Chart]

Being stuck with little or no home equity is no longer a rare situation. Christopher Cagan, director of research at First American CoreLogic, a housing and mortgage data supplier in Santa Ana, recently found that nearly 7% of 32 million U.S. households studied as of December owed more than their homes were worth, based on computer estimates of the property values. An additional 4% had home equity of 5% or less. Since then, house prices have edged down in much of the country, erasing more home equity.

Without a cushion of equity, homeowners are vulnerable to losing their homes to foreclosure if they suddenly are out of work, suffer a serious illness or, like the Montes family, face a jump in mortgage payments.

Partly as a result, foreclosures are surging. Moody's Economy.com, a research firm in West Chester, Pa., projects that lenders will acquire about 760,000 homes through foreclosure this year and 935,000 in 2008, up from an average of about 440,000 a year from 2000 through 2006.

When the Monteses decided to buy the bungalow in 2005, they had only a so-so credit record and little savings. So they settled for a "subprime" loan, with costlier terms than those available in the prime market.

The Monteses' primary loan is the type that became the dominant subprime mortgage during the housing boom of the first half of this decade -- and now has become a symbol of misguided lending, swept away by regulatory fiat and investors' flight from mortgages deemed too risky. These loans are known in the trade as 2/28 mortgages. The interest rate is fixed at a relatively low rate for the first two years (5.45% in the Monteses' case), then floats at a predetermined margin above an interest-rate index for the next 28 years. In many cases, that "reset" of the interest rate after two years leads to a monthly payment increase of 30% or more.

U.S. lenders originated about $600 billion of subprime home loans in 2006, or 20% of all home mortgages, according to Inside Mortgage Finance, a trade publication. About 56% of those subprime loans were 2/28 mortgages, says Keith Ernst, senior policy counsel at the Center for Responsible Lending, a nonprofit research and lobbying group in Durham, N.C.
[Mario and Leticia Montes and daughter, Christina, in front of their house in Fullerton, Calif.]
Mario and Leticia Montes and daughter, Christina, in front of their house in Fullerton, Calif.

The lending industry touted the 2/28 loans as "affordability" mortgages, because they helped people buy houses that wouldn't have been affordable with the higher immediate payments on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages. To make the loans even more affordable in the early years, they were often structured as "interest-only," meaning that principal payments were deferred until later.

Lenders sometimes described these loans as "credit-repair tools." The idea was that people with blemished credit records could take out a 2/28 subprime loan and keep up with the payments long enough to improve their credit records and qualify for a less-costly prime loan.

Earlier this year, regulators ordered subprime lenders to make such loans based on the borrower's ability to afford the loan after the reset, not just for the initial two years, as was the common practice. That change, along with tighter guidelines from rating agencies and risk-aversion among investors, has recently prompted major subprime lenders to stop making 2/28 loans. Instead, they are making more subprime loans that carry a fixed rate for at least five years, as well as ones that hold down payments by stretching the payments over 40 years instead of 30.

The Montes family got their loan through a mortgage broker in Rancho Cucamonga. Using what was then a common formula, the broker offered to arrange for two loans, one to cover about 80% of the home price and the other, a so-called piggyback loan, for the rest. For the first two years, their total monthly mortgage payments are about $3,200. The loans are initially interest-only.

Mr. Montes recalls feeling edgy about whether he would be able to afford the higher costs -- about $900 more per month -- due to take effect after two years. But he says the broker assured him he could refinance before those costs kicked in.

Mr. Montes preferred not to name the broker publicly because the broker has a business connection with a relative of the Monteses. The broker declined to comment.

Mrs. Montes says she was apprehensive about the broker's assurances. "But I blame that on that I don't understand the lingo they were talking," she says. "It's a scary experience.... All I could see was all these numbers flash before me.... I said, 'Mario, I hope you don't get into something that is going to hurt us.'"

They moved into their home and hung a sign on the front door reading, "Life is a daily celebration of love." Within months, things started going wrong. The Monteses received a letter informing them their property taxes had been reassessed based on the $567,000 sale price instead of its previous $389,000 value. That raised their taxes to $6,000 from $2,900 a year and would have increased their monthly payments (including the mortgages and taxes) to $3,931. "Whoa!" Mr. Montes recalls saying. "I can't afford this. I went into emergency mode."

He was able to successfully challenge part of the tax increase, but another shock came in late February of this year when he began looking at refinancing possibilities. Mr. Montes says four brokers -- including the one who arranged the original loan -- turned him away, saying it wouldn't be possible to refinance because, with home prices flat at best, the family had little or no equity in the home. Worse for the Monteses, they learned that they faced a $12,000 prepayment penalty if they refinanced within three years of the original mortgages -- something that Mr. Montes says wasn't made clear to him when he took out those loans.

Then another broker told him in March that his home had gained enough in value for him to qualify for a more affordable loan. They paid for an appraisal and were told their home was worth $620,000, or about $53,000 more than they paid in 2005. The Monteses were jubilant, thinking their home was saved. But more than three months later, the broker outlined a package that would have involved payments far higher than indicated in earlier meetings.

Next, Mr. Montes sought the help of Laurie Arnold, a former neighbor who is a loan officer at IndyMac Bancorp, a large lender based in Pasadena. In another blow, Mr. Montes learned that the appraisal he had done in March -- at a cost of $375 -- is no longer valid. Ms. Arnold sounded out appraisers and concluded that there was no hope the house could appraise for enough to allow the family to qualify for a refinancing. Based on recent sale prices and other data, Zillow.com, an online service that provides home-value information, estimates that the price of a typical home in Fullerton is down 6.7% from a year ago.

The Monteses now hope for help from the company that services their loan, America's Servicing Co., a unit of Wells Fargo & Co. Mr. Montes telephoned America's Servicing Tuesday to ask whether it might consider a modification in the terms of the loans to help him keep the payments affordable beyond the reset date. An employee of the servicing company said that wouldn't be possible if the family has no home equity, Mr. Montes says.

A Wells spokesman declined to comment on the Monteses' loan but said the bank reviews requests for loan modifications "on a case-by-case basis and works with customers on solutions that address their individual financial needs."

Mr. Montes says the family may try to sell the house, but that would be tricky in today's weak market. Or they could try to trim other expenses and keep meeting the higher monthly home payments that are due to take effect in December.

Borrowing for College

There is very little wiggle room. Mr. and Mrs. Montes also have two car loans, with payments totaling about $700 a month, and are borrowing more money to help put their elder daughter through college. They recently had to tell their younger daughter they couldn't afford $70 a month for her to take piano lessons.

The couple now eat out once or twice a month, instead of once or twice a week before they bought the house. They have yet to visit a nearby jazz club they had hoped to frequent. The trips they used to take to Lake Tahoe now are out of the question.

To bring in a bit more income, Mr. Montes two weeks ago found a weekend job as a bartender for a catering company. He says he might be able to take on a third job.

"Bottom line, it's our little home," Mrs. Montes told a visitor one evening in April as tears welled in her eyes. "We're going to keep it. Hopefully, we won't go down and if we do, we're going to go down with a fight."

Write to James R. Hagerty at bob.hagerty@wsj.com3 and Ken Gepfert at Ken.Gepfert@wsj.com4
URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118722072707499017.html

Hyperlinks in this Article:
(1) http://forums.wsj.com/viewtopic.php?t=709
(2) http://forums.wsj.com/viewtopic.php?t=709
(3) mailto:bob.hagerty@wsj.com
(4) mailto:Ken.Gepfert@wsj.com


Copyright 2007 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law.

CA mo bee

http://www.modbee.com/local/story/44087.html

Home sales prices plunged again in July, pushing median prices down more than 13 percent throughout the Northern San Joaquin Valley compared with July 2006.

DataQuick Information Systems, which gathers home sales statistics from public records, released these statistics Wednesday:

# Stanislaus County homes sold for a median price of $324,500 in July, down $48,750 from last year and down $18,750 from June.

# San Joaquin County homes sold for a median $380,000 in July, down $60,000 from last year and down $16,000 from June.

# Merced County homes sold for a median $316,000 in July, down $53,000 from last year but up $26,000 from June.

Home sales volume also plummeted in July.

In Stanislaus County, for instance, 371 homes sold in July compared with 706 for the same month last year and 519 in June.

San Joaquin County had 562 homes sell in July, compared with 988 last year and 666 in June.

"The drop in the number of sales is more significant to us than the change in median price," said Stanislaus County Assessor Doug Harms.

Median sales prices can vary based on the size of homes sold in any month, but Harms said the dramatic decline in overall sales "indicates the market is doing very poorly."

Harms said home value declines are widespread.

"If you bought your house within the last three years, it's probably worth less today," said Harms, whose office is reassessing home values to potentially lower property taxes for thousands of homeowners.

Harms said his office has lowered assessments on about 6,000 Stanislaus County homes, and he knows more need to be lowered. Homeowners who want their assessments reviewed can request it by calling 525-6461.

"We'll probably review every property that (sold) after July 2003," Harms said.

Homeowners aren't so thrilled when real estate agents tell them they can't sell their home for as much as they had thought it was worth.

"We have to inform our sellers to be realistic and lower their price, but not all sellers are willing to do that," said John Christiansen, who has a real estate brokerage and is chairman of the Modesto Council of the Central Valley Association of Realtors.

Christiansen said many agents must try to convince sellers to drop prices $25,000 or more to attract buyers. And when sellers won't, he said "there are agents who have basically fired their clients."

But the number of homes for sale continues to rise even though buyers are tough to find.

In Modesto, about 1,950 homes were listed for sale by Realtors as of last week. But since the year began, Realtors have sold about 1,000 Modesto homes.

At that pace, it could take more than a year for the typical home to find a buyer.

"Inventory is continuing to go up, but buyers are kind of waiting for prices to hit a bottom," Christiansen said. More than anything else, Christiansen said, what motivates buyers are low prices.

But home prices aren't low enough to be affordable for most Northern San Joaquin Valley families, according to Darryl Rutherford, a researcher for the California Coalition for Rural Housing.

Considering Stanislaus County's median-income family earns about $54,000 a year, Rutherford said median home prices would have to drop to about $185,000 to be affordable.

At that price, Rutherford said, the typical family would spend about one-third of its income on housing, including mortgage, taxes and insurance.

"Right now, housing costs pose a huge burden on families, taking up 40 to 50 percent of their incomes," Rutherford said.

"For society as a whole, we would be better off if home prices went down further," said Rutherford, although he acknowledged such declines could be financially disastrous for homeowners.

"But people are looking at housing with the wrong eye. They look at it like something that should be bought and sold for a maximum profit," Rutherford said. "Instead of thinking of housing as a commodity for profit, people should think of it as more of a right."

Bee staff writer J.N. Sbranti can be reached at jnsbranti@modbee.com or

Monday, August 13, 2007

CA Links 9.13.07

New York Times



LA Times



Daily News



KCRA.com


NY Times


SF Chronicle



SF Chronicle

Sunday, August 12, 2007

CA Mod Bee

Modesto Bee


As foreclosures mount and "for sale" signs proliferate among Northern San Joaquin Valley homes, Realtors continue a refrain: "Now is the time to buy."

But for someone who missed the frenzy a few years ago, the changed world of local home buying still requires some knowledge beforehand, according to experts.

And knowledge in this case really is power, because with so many houses on the market, the buyer holds all the cards.

"Buyers have an enormous ability to haggle over costs," said Ken Kohler, a Realtor with Century 21 M&M and Associates.

"But the bottom line is that the seller has to make some money off the deal, so you can't come in and lowball too much," he said.

Still, the market has given buyers the advantage: More inventory, more short-sell homes at reduced prices, mortgage rates at two-year lows, and more sellers desperate to escape a mortgage that boomeranged on them, Realtors said.

That means buyers can ask sellers to handle closing costs or offer other incentives.

That was the case for new homeowner Mickey Yates.

Sticker shock had kept him and his wife from buying a house, he said, because they couldn't afford a house that was more than $350,000.

But they found something different when they began shopping again this year.

Now they own a home in Keyes with $15,000 in rebates, $6,000 in blinds and free landscaping from the builder, he said. Total price with the rebates: $273,000.

"The owners now are caught between a rock and a hard place," Yates said, adding that he thinks new-home builders may make more concessions than existing-home sellers who are loathe to lose money.

A good credit score also helped, he said.

"It was a really good buying experience," said Yates, 37. "And it wouldn't have happened before."

Lana Dyer, an independent Modesto Realtor and appraiser, said she encourages clients tobe bold in the face of a high price.

"Don't be put off by the price people are asking," Dyer said. "Make an offer."

If a home has been on the market for 100 days or longer, she said, the seller may be motivated to take a reduced price.

Buyers also have time on their side. Fewer buyers and lots of desperate sellers mean home shoppers can be choosy about what they buy and what loan they'll use to buy it.

Mike Zagaris, president of PMZ Real Estate in Modesto, said buyers should search thoroughly because the inventory is so plentiful.

But the failure of so many loans, which helped create more inventory, comes with some caveats for those buyers, Zagaris and other experts said.

Banks are less likely to take a chance on a buyer with shaky credit. And the subprime loans popular during the height of the housing boom largely have faded.

Century 21 M&M agent Yolanda Esparza Winters said she's seen some neighborhoods with multiple bank-owned homes. She suspects that on those streets, the former owners may have had subprime loans with conditions that eventually caused defaults.

The buyers got the homes with low initial payments, but couldn't meet their obligations when the loans' interest rates soared a few months later and the payments increased.

"If a buyer who seeks a home has the financing all arranged, that makes the process go that much faster," she said. "Sellers look for that."

Winters, who works in Manteca, said she has encouraged sellers to be flexible.

The buyer who is pre-qualified for a loan before shopping, and has strong credit, has even more leverage, she and other Realtors said.

Dyer said she has seen two deals fall through in recent weeks because the buyers didn't know their own ability to pay.

When one couple realized the mortgage payment would be $2,400 a month, she said, weeks of negotiations stopped.

First-time buyers such as Yates should follow the same advice as other buyers, experts said: Establish good credit, and choose carefully.

They also should investigate special programs for first-time buyers that are offered by private lenders and the federal government.

There also still is a place for the buyer who looks at real estate mostly as an investment — but not in the short term.

Bob Nowak and Jan Carrico run a monthly meeting in Salida for people to discuss real estate investing.

"It's very hard to buy something now and expect it to be worth more in 30 days," Nowak said, describing a practice known as "flipping," where houses were bought and sold in rapid fashion.

The practice was common during the real estate boom but has declined as home appreciation has slowed or even disappeared. "So you have to buy smarter," Nowak said.

That means considering whether the house could be rented out, or determining when the right time to sell would be, he said.

For a prospective homeowner of any kind, experts agreed, the times of good buying opportunity may not last long.

Kohler, of Century 21, said many think interest rates will rise in the next few months, even if prices continue to fall.

And eventually the oversupply of houses will stop, and prices will head upward again, though no one's predicting when that will happen.

"It can't go down forever," Dyer said. "It wouldn't scare me, if I could, to make an offer and buy a house now."

Bee staff writer Ben van der Meer can be reached at bvandermeer@modbee.com or 578-2331.

Friday, August 10, 2007

AZ

AZ Family


For an area that continues to see more and more houses going up, experts say many of their values are less and less every day.

“It's an unsure market. Nobody can tell what's going to happen,” said Realtor Ben Garrett.

Garrett has been tracking the Valley housing market for about three years – long enough to see the peak in 2005 and the problems the market faces now.

While the average sale cost has actually gone up about $14,000, the average value has dropped from $179 to $171 per square foot.

“And that's giving a false sense of security that this market's continuing to rise when it's really not," he said. "The cost per square foot is getting less and people are getting less for their houses when they're selling them than they were the year before.”

And as a result, far fewer houses are selling at all.

Garrett said during this same week in 2005, more than 2,100 homes sold throughout the Valley. In 2006, 1,200 sold. This year, only 713 have sold.

And in addition to the sluggish market, there has been a flood of foreclosures – about 27,000 Valleywide so far this year.

CA santa maria times

Saanta Maria Times.


It's not unusual to see one-day or one-weekend sale prices advertised on groceries, appliances, sporting goods, cars and even recreational vehicles.

But rarely do you see a sale on brand-new homes with prices marked down as much as $30,000.

Yet that's what's happening this weekend and next as Centex Homes conducts what it calls its Golden Opportunity Sale at the Gardens at Briar Creek in Lompoc.

The sale may be less a sign of the times, however, than it is of the company's desire to reduce its inventory of move-in-ready homes.

Andrea Bradford, director of marketing for Centex Homes, said the company would like to sell off some of its inventory before the end of the metric quarter determined by Wall Street.

“It's really not a secret that right now the housing market is on the slow side, although we're seeing an uptick in some of our neighborhoods,” Bradford said.

“We have a limited number of homes that are ready to move into right now, and we're willing to offer outstanding, outstanding offers on them,” she said. “... We have six homes that we're highly motivated to sell. We think we'll sell all six in two weekends.”

Advertisement
Prices start around $460,000. The one- and two-story homes range from 2,167 to 2,648 square feet. Some have four bedrooms with large “bonus rooms,” up to 2 1/2 baths and two-car garages.

Features include kitchen pantries and islands, family- or great-room fireplaces and walk-in master suite closets in every home.

“These are really beautiful homes,” Bradford said. “We have a number of people living there now, and it's really a neighborhood in the old-fashioned way - the ‘play in the street, ride your bicycle' type of neighborhood.”

n n n

Marking down prices on new homes is not a common strategy among home builders in this area, especially among smaller and custom-home builders.

And most observers don't expect to see more of it, despite sluggish home sales right now.

“Centex is a little different because of their scale,” said Jerry Bunin, government affairs director for the Home Builders Association of the Central Coast. “They're one of the major builders working in (San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara) counties, and they're one of the top three or four builders in the country.”

Centex operates in major housing markets in 25 states and built more than 35,000 homes in its fiscal year ending March 31, according to company statistics.

But rather than build a large volume of homes like Centex, smaller builders tend to pace their construction rates based on the market, Bunin said. That's why you won't see small builders' new homes in special sales.

“What (the smaller builders) are doing is a lot of waiting,” Bunin said. “There's kind of a fine line between having an approved project and continuing to pay interest on it and the loss you're taking through that, and building units and increasing the amount of money you have out in a market that's kind of slow right now.”

For example, he said, if a builder had most of the units finished in a development, that builder would go ahead and finish out the last few units to complete the project.

“But people certainly wouldn't start a new project” given the soft market at the moment, he said.

Centex's sale also may be rooted in another factor.

“I think it may be because the company is leaving (the Central Coast) in the next couple of years,” Bunin said.

Chris Bowley, division manager for the L.A.-Central Coast Division of Centex, couldn't be reached for comment by press time. But he has said the company won't be starting any new projects between Monterey County and Santa Barbara.

“It's been kind of common knowledge for some time,” Bunin said of Centex's plan to leave the Central Coast market.

n n n

Even if other builders aren't holding short-term sales on their new homes, some are offering other incentives, as is Centex.

“We haven't seen a whole lot (of new homes marked down) in Santa Barbara County because there's not a lot of new housing there,” Bradford said. “But we have seen some incentives offered by builders in SLO County, including by ourselves.”

For example, she said, Centex has seven homes left to sell out of the 61 in the project called 3592 Broad Street in San Luis Obispo.

To move those homes, ranging in price from $530,000 to $580,000, the company is offering special financing as well as help with closing costs through Centex's related mortgage, title and insurance services.

“That's typically what happens” when there is a standing inventory of homes, Bradford said of the incentives. “We're trying to add value.”

To make Centex homes more att- ractive to buyers, the company also offers a two-year “Fit and Finish Limited Warranty,” providing an extra year of coverage over the industry standard.

“We don't build homes so they can sit there; we build homes to sell,” Bradford said. “If we can help someone get into a home who didn't think they ever could, that's good. And, of course, it's good for us, too.”

Mike Hodgson can be reached at 739-2221 or mhodgson@santamariatimes.com.

July 29, 2007

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

CA OCBJ

The Orange County Business Journal.

Newport Beach homebuilder William Lyon Homes Inc. reported a pre-tax loss of $77.8 million in the second quarter on Wednesday, compared to profits of $50 million a year ago.

The loss included $84.4 million in write-downs for land the homebuilder owns, to account for softening market conditions and slow sales.

The company, which builds in California, Arizona and Nevada, is facing the same challenges as other builders in the slow housing market. In the second quarter, William Lyon home deliveries dropped 29% compared to a year ago, while home orders fell 11%.

The company posted consolidated operating revenues of $271.1 million in the quarter, which was down 34% from a year ago. The homes it sold had an average price of $468,800 last quarter, compared to $529,500 a year ago.

William Lyon Homes is managing the housing downturn as a private company, following a buyout in July 2006. Chairman and Chief Executive Gen. William Lyon engineered the privatization, paying about $275 million to buy roughly 25% of company he didn’t already own.

The deal valued William Lyon Homes at about $950 million at the time.

Sunday, August 05, 2007

OR WA

Bend Bulletin

A few years ago, Krishan Tinney was stuck in traffic — again — on her grinding commute from Los Angeles to Ventura County. So she called a friend in Bend to kill some time.

“What are you doing?” Tinney asked.

“Oh, I just got off work,” her friend said. “Thought I’d walk down to the river and float for a while.”

It was 4 o’clock on a Thursday afternoon.

A few months later, Tinney and her husband, an engineer, ditched Southern California, moved to Bend and bought a house — something that was way beyond their means in SoCal’s heady housing market. Since then, he has recruited friends to join him at Columbia Aircraft Manufacturing Corp. Her parents have moved here, too.

The Tinneys sold their first house a few months ago and moved into a bigger, brand-new one in south Bend’s Renaissance Ridge subdivision.

“We could never have done this in Ventura County,” Tinney said, plucking a few weeds from her tiny new lawn last week as she got ready to take her young daughter swimming. “We feel very fortunate. We love it here.”

Drawn by the lure of relatively affordable housing through the years, the low-key, small-city atmosphere and the stunning natural beauty of Central Ore­gon, Tinney and thousands of newcomers like her have rained a remarkable streak of good fortune on Bend’s housing market.

Since 1988 — the year the city pulled out of its last major real estate slump — the average price of a Bend home has shot up an average of 11.3 percent per year, according to Central Oregon Multiple Listing Service numbers, dwarfing the 4.8 percent average annual gain in the nation’s average home price during that period and rivaling the

12 percent average annual return of the S&P 500 stock index.

Even ignoring the unsustainable growth rates of the boom years of 2004-06, the city’s real estate gains have been impressive.

The average price of Bend houses gained an average of

10 percent per year from 1988 to 2003, according MLS numbers, while prices nationally climbed only about 4.2 percent per year.

Of course, the numbers are rough. Some of Bend’s average price gains have come more from increases in the construction of super-expensive homes than from the price appreciation of individual houses. Still, it’s clear that the local housing economy hasn’t experienced anything like a drawdown in nearly a generation.

Until, possibly, this year.

The inventory of unsold homes in the Bend market has swelled to record numbers this year, while sales levels for the first six month of the year have fallen back to levels not seen since 2003.

The traditional underlying drivers of the local housing market are likely still there, University of Oregon economist Tim Duy said Thursday. Newcomers are still attracted to Central Oregon’s natural beauty and, even at today’s prices, average housing prices here remain lower than they are in neighboring California and in other high-priced regions along the nation’s gold coasts.

But working off all of those unsold houses might bring some pain, Duy said. The only question is how much and for how long.

“I’ve got to think that the world is not falling apart here,” Duy said. “But prices are going to have to come down to get rid of whatever excess inventory has built up.”

Rough past

Bend’s prices have appreciated so much during the past 20 years, Duy noted, partly because they started so low.

The real estate economy here was in rough shape as the 1970s faded into the ’80s, Brooks Resources Corp. CEO Mike Hollern recalled recently.

A housing boom in the late 1970s attracted a stream of new contractors to town and filled neighborhoods with new housing, Hollern said, but the optimism didn’t last long. Interest rates spiked in the early 1980s as the Federal Reserve Board launched an aggressive battle against inflation, sending average mortgage rates soaring from the 9.25 percent average of 1978 to a peak of nearly 15 percent in 1982.

That, combined with an employment crunch in the wood products industry, hit Bend’s economy hard, Hollern said. Downtown shops closed and boarded their windows. Contractors pulled up stakes and left town.

Don Kelleher, now a longtime real estate agent, was in a retail business at the time, trying to make ends meet while paying 19 percent interest on inventory loans. His wife, a real estate agent at the time, closed deals that required the sellers to bring money to the table because the sales prices of their homes could no longer pay off their mortgages.

From the exuberance of the 1970s, confidence plunged to an all-time low.

“There was a time when we would hear about a housing start — just one house, not a subdivision — and everybody would drive by to see who the hell was building a house,” Hollern said. “Whoever it is must be crazy.”

It took the local housing market years to recover.

From 1983 — the earliest year for which the Central Oregon Multiple Listing Service has reliable numbers — through 1985, the average price of a Bend home fell more than 8 percent, from $54,521 to $50,144. Prices staged a brief rally in 1986 as mortgage interest rates dropped back below the 10 percent mark again. But 1987 brought another 2.8 percent slide, and the average price of a Bend house — which amounted to only about $54,000 that year — was less than half the national average.

Weakness in the housing market was mirrored by sluggishness in other market sectors, Hollern said.

Brooks Resources — formed in 1968 as the real estate arm of the old Brooks-Scanlon lumber company — started Shevlin Center, which today is a thriving hub of office buildings and industrial plants on the west side of the Deschutes River along Colorado Avenue, in the early 1980s. But nothing happened for years, even though Brooks and the city poured thousands of dollars into the Colorado Avenue bridge and other improvements.

Awbrey Butte also stood virtually empty through the first half of the ’80s, Hollern said, even though Brooks bought it in 1970 and master planned it a few years later.

Still, the city was beginning to sprout some of the seeds of its future growth. Developments like the High Desert Museum, along with a trickle of new concert series, new restaurants and new shops increased the city’s attractiveness while the Sunriver Resort, founded by investor John Gray in the mid-1960s, and Black Butte Ranch, founded by Brooks Resources in 1970, exposed the area to a steady stream of tourists from the cities of California and the Pacific Northwest.

Developments like the new St. Charles Medical Center, meanwhile, increased the city’s service level and formed the nexus for a growing employment base, Hollern noted. But the key to the city’s growth through the 1990s and beyond proved to be its attractiveness to retirees and young, skilled urban workers who brought pre-existing wealth or, in some cases, their own jobs with them when they moved to the High Desert.

“We have become,” Hollern said, “a poster child for the non-placebound economy.”

From close to the bottom of Oregon’s 36 counties in terms of household income in the early years of the 1990s, Deschutes County has climbed to among the highest in the state, Hollern noted. Still, storm clouds have gathered again around its housing market.

Speculative bubble

From 2004 through 2006, the smooth, upward-trending curve that maps Bend’s historical housing prices takes a sudden jump upward.

Fueled by cheap mortgage rates and intense investor interest, the average price of Bend’s housing shot up 24 percent per year in that span, giving the city a prominent spot on national rankings of overpriced housing markets.

Whether that’s fair or not is debatable. Most relative price rankings — including a quarterly report generated by Global Insight and National City Mortgage that pegged Bend at or near the top of its list for more than a year — attempt to measure the degree of an area’s “overpriced” condition by comparing home prices to prevailing local wages, leaving investment income, self-employed income and other common sources of Bend household wealth out of the equation.

Still, there’s no doubt that home prices have broken beyond the city’s established trend line, said Duy, who tracks a collection of local economic data to produce a quarterly Central Oregon economic index for The Bulletin. The question now is, where does it go from here?

Some factors, like the city’s continuing attractiveness to wealthy newcomers, are likely to continue to drive growth for years to come, Duy said. But other shorter-term factors, like the oversupply of houses for sale, a growing credit crunch in the mortgage lending industry and the deflation of investor interest in the housing market here and nationwide, all foreshadow some tough months, or years, to come for local residential real estate.

Sellers in any real estate market are psychologically resistant to lowering home prices, Duy said, but the market’s current angst could work itself out through one of a couple of scenarios: prices could come down, which could drain the area’s excess inventory quickly if they come down far enough, or prices will remain stuck somewhere around their current levels or even rise while the region relies on population growth to work off the excess — a process that could take much longer.

Bend money manager Bill Valentine, who warned his radio talk show listeners about inflation in the local housing market as early as 2005, likened the choice to the difference between ripping a Band-Aid off quickly to take the pain all at once, or peeling it off hair by painful hair.

“It has to return to the trend line, and it’s going to happen in one of two ways: fast and ugly or slow and painful,” Valentine said Thursday. “We are gonna end up in the same place, regardless, with a healthy real estate market. We’re probably gonna end up with a thinned-out real estate force, but we still have a great place to live, and people will still be able to make a decent living building houses here and selling real estate.”

A couple of wildcards — recession or rapidly rising interest rates — could make recovery longer and tougher, Valentine said, although an out-and-out recession seems unlikely at this point, and 10-year Treasury bond rates, which tend to foreshadow mortgage rates, have actually dipped in recent weeks.

Hollern, who has led Brooks Resources, the region’s largest development company, since its founding, said he also sees a bright future for real estate here over the next 20 years, although he also sees pain coming in the short term.

“We are overbuilt at the moment,” Hollern said. “But as long as our growth rate — in terms of real people, real jobs and real kids — continues, we’ll work through this in a couple of years and things will pick up again.”

That couple of years, though, could feel like a long stretch for some.

Justin Peterson, a 30-year-old Bend mortgage broker, grew up in Redmond. Up until this year, he hadn’t experienced a local real estate downturn in his lifetime. Now, he’s living through one.

Peterson and his wife bought three investment houses during the boom years of 2005 and 2006. He’s trying to sell one now to generate cash, so far without much luck. Two are rented.

The experience so far hasn’t soured him on real estate investing, Peterson said, but lessons have been learned. Going forward, he said he’ll be more conservative, maybe buying a property every few years rather than buying them in a lump, reducing the chances of buying at the peak of a cycle. He’ll stay more liquid, too — cash is king in a downturn, and it can take a lot of cash to hang onto houses to wait one out.

But for now, like a lot of other recent investors, he’s a seller.

“We definitely haven’t lost faith in real estate, for sure,” Peterson said Thursday. “We’ll just get past this correction and make our adjustments and move on.”

News Tribune


Known for having some of the biggest houses and miles of shoreline, the Gig Harbor area holds another, less desirable distinction: Pierce County’s largest supply of for-sale homes.

Gig Harbor’s inventory of such houses and condominiums stood at 9.7 months in July, according to statistics compiled by Northwest Multiple Listing Service director Dick Beeson. The number measures how long it would take to sell every home that’s listed, putting Gig Harbor deep into a buyer’s market.

And hundreds more homes are planned.

Developers and real estate agents point to several factors that contribute to today’s depth of supply beyond a general market malaise, including prior buyer hesitation over construction of the second Narrows bridge and a tucked-away location that makes it difficult to commute beyond Tacoma.

Also, the area’s pricey homes take far longer to sell than their more economical counterparts. Homes listed for more than $1 million in the first half of 2007 were projected to sell in 25.6 months, compared with an average 6.8 months for those listed at $500,000 or less, according to Beeson. The area examined includes Fox Island and the Key Peninsula.

Although the abundance of choices favors buyers, agents say Gig Harbor’s hefty inventory means buyers can’t expect to make a quick profit. Sellers, on the other hand, need to be on their A-game and price right, they say.

Meanwhile, sales have started at Harbor Crossing, a collection of more than 100 urban-styled houses. And plans are taking shape for Harbor Hill in north Gig Harbor, where 800 to 1,200 homes are expected.

NOT MUCH INTEREST IN CONDO PROJECT

Developer Dave Devin is more than half finished converting 62 apartments to condos at Harbor Glen within earshot of Highway 16, where he’s installing granite counters, hardwood floors, new showers and new kitchen appliances.

Devin said he studied in-demand condo projects in Seattle and Bellevue when designing the retrofit.

“I thought once I got this thing done, the public would be coming to my door. I still haven’t generated much traffic,” he said.

After listing the first ones in April, he’s sold two, with offers on two more.

Prices on the three-bedroom units have been cut from $289,950 to $259,950. Two bedrooms were reduced from $259,950 to $229,950.

Real estate agent Minh Chau Trinh, who’s selling the condos and is also a partner in the project, attributes slow sales at Harbor Glen and supply issues elsewhere in Gig Harbor to the area’s lack of home-grown jobs. The opening of the 80-bed St. Anthony Hospital in 2009 should help, she said.

“I would say probably in another year, things will really start selling,” she said.

Ed Aro, a John L. Scott agent and consultant to home builders, said newly built homes still sell in Gig Harbor. But they have to be meticulously designed and on the right piece of property, he said.

“You can’t throw up a house and have it sell, which is what was happening the past four years,” he said.

Bennett Homes is building almost half of the houses at Harbor Crossing, within walking distance from the planned hospital and a new YMCA and Costco in North Gig Harbor.

The subdivision’s location and the kind of homes being put up, with tiny yards, shared driveways and master bedrooms on the first floors, will overcome any supply issues, said Linda Kepler, a real estate agent for Bennett.

“I just think there’s a real need for this type of housing, because it’s so different,” she said.

‘NOT A SHORT-TERM BUY’

If buyers are looking for equity, they should be purchasing for at least five rather than three years, said Beeson, also a broker at Windermere.

“This is definitely not a short-term buy,” he said. “But the market out there is similar to what it was in the early 2000s.”

In July, a Gig Harbor home sat on the market an average of 95 days, he said. In 2003, the average was 98 days.

Real estate agents in Gig Harbor, like elsewhere, say buyers know they have time to make decisions so they’re taking it.

“There are buyers. They keep coming back. There’s no urgency,” said Premier Northwest Properties agent Paul Redal, who’s selling new houses in the Artondale area for $795,000 to $1.3 million. “Buyers are waiting to see how far prices will go down.”

Preliminary numbers show July’s median price in Gig Harbor declined by 2.7 percent from the previous year – from $392,500 to $382,450.

On 1 to 3 acres, the houses include outdoor fireplaces, master suites and two garages. Two of the eight have sold.

“If I had had these homes done last year, every one of them would be sold, no question,” Redal said.

Transactions also get drawn out by offers made contingent on the sale of another house – a slow sale on one means a slow sale on the other, Redal said. Such a situation led the builder of the Artondale houses to offer to purchase a buyer’s home for about $500,000 on Fox Island to sell one in the subdivision for $1.1 million.

Much like the way investors time the stock market, home owners are trying to time the real estate market, said RE/MAX agent Mary Souza. And, in Gig Harbor, they tend to be well-educated owners with a high net worth who, therefore, watch real estate more closely than most.

“The feeling is, ‘the market has tapped out, the market has peaked. We should put our house on the market now before we see a loss of value,’” she said.

Souza expects median home prices in Gig Harbor to depreciate some through the end of the year, level off in 2008 and begin to increase again by the end of next year.

‘THEY SEE THE GOLDEN GOOSE’

Some sellers haven’t yet locked into the reality of today’s market, said Windermere agent Andrew Welch.

“There was such a demand, and they see the golden goose, and they think their house is worth way more than the market will bear,” he said.

Allison Skibbs Welch, also a Windermere agent and married to Andrew, said with so much competition, houses need to be in pristine condition and priced right.

Rather than list a home today by adding 10 percent to a nearby comparable sale, Skibbs Welch said now she tends to deduct 10 percent.

Kyle Lawson, who wants to sell his 3,248-square-foot house and buy something smaller, said he’s a bit discouraged. His house, which sits on nearly 8 acres near Kopachuck Park, was listed seven months ago for more than $850,000.

He and his wife, Danielle, bought the house four years ago for $360,000 and did a $150,000 remodel, including new windows, doors, moulding and carpet.

They got a new agent in July and dropped the price to $749,700, where Lawson said he thought it should be in the first place.

Lawson, who owns a hair-cutting franchise in Federal Way, is optimistic the house will sell before summer ends.

“It’s a matter of whether we drop the price so it’s a fantastic deal, or do we hold out knowing the market will pick up?” said Lawson. “On the other hand, I’m not worried about buying in Gig Harbor. It’s a buyer’s market.”

A look at the Gig Harbor-area housing market, including the Key Peninsula and Fox Island

July 2002

Median price: $222,250

Average days on market: 80

July 2003

Median price: $264,450

Average days on market: 98

July 2004

Median price: $273,000

Average days on market: 65

July 2005

Median price: $340,750

Average days on market: 73

July 2006

Median price: $392,500

Average days on market: 77

July 2007 (as of 7/24)

Median price: $382,450

Average days on market: 95 RE/MAX agent