Thursday, November 29, 2007

CA VCS 11.29.07

Ventura County


Still stinging from the housing market's credit woes that have left some potential buyers unable to qualify for financing, Ventura County home sales plunged last month while the median price slid further.

The median sales price for existing single-family detached homes fell to $650,570, down 4.6 percent from $681,820 in September and 3.1 percent from $671,330 in October 2006, the California Association of Realtors reported Wednesday. The median is the midpoint, where half the homes sell for more and half for less.

Sales tumbled 52.6 percent compared with the same month a year ago, and fell 3.5 percent from September.

While there's been "a huge falloff in sales" during the past two years, the median price has held steady, said Bill Watkins, executive director of the UC Santa Barbara Economic Forecast Project.

"It seems the longer sales are weak, the more likely prices will weaken," Watkins said. "The most likely scenario — we continue to see weak sales and soft prices until developers' inventories are worked down."

Working harder helps

Despite the bleak results, some real estate professionals say they're surviving by working a lot harder.

Marcella Poitras, a Realtor with Century 21 Home Land Realtors in Oxnard, goes door-knocking for up to three hours every day to distribute 100 fliers.

"I work hard," she said. "I call it planting seeds."

While other Realtors have left the profession or taken part-time jobs, Poitras reports her sales have doubled compared with last year. She currently has eight listings and six properties in escrow that are expected to close by the end of the year.

Poitras credits her success to her determination and market conditions, namely the rise in foreclosures.

In October, there were 224,451 foreclosure filings nationwide, up 94 percent from a year ago, according to RealtyTrac's U.S. Foreclosure Market Report, released today. The filings include default notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions.

California had the second highest foreclosure rate, behind Nevada, reporting one foreclosure filing for every 258 households, or 50,401 total — triple the amount reported last year — according to the Irvine-based company. In Ventura County, there were 648 filings in October, up from 169 a year ago.

Even though the market might bottom out next year, it's still a "perfect time to buy" because interest rates are still low and there's enough inventory for buyers to be choosy, Poitras said.

"The market is saturated with foreclosures, and the buyers are finally ready to buy," Poitras said.

Investors are leading the pack, with first-time homebuyers starting to follow, she said.

Sales are steady for Hope Goss, a Realtor with Realty Executives in Ventura. For the year, she's averaged one to two deals a month, off about 35 percent from a year ago. Goss said she expects December will be the best month of the year, with four scheduled closings.

"There are plenty of buyers still sitting on the fence waiting for the perfect time," she said.

"The serious ones are making really good deals. That's the point — there are some really good deals to be had for those people who couldn't buy in the hot market a few years ago."

Holiday sellers committed

Potential buyers and sellers remaining in the market during the busy holiday season are committed, Hope said.

"You have to be pretty serious to put your house on the market, because the offers that are out there are not full-price offers," she said.

October sales at Simi Valley-based Troop Real Estate were off about 30 percent from last year, said Brian Troop, president of the company. He said he expects more of the same this month and next, though he anticipates a "fairly decent December."

There are now more than 200 homes in Ventura County that are priced at $417,000 or less, which meets the conforming loan limit, Troop said.

"We've seen more activity in the last 30 days than we've seen any month this year," he said. "A lot of buyers are writing offers. They're realizing this is probably the real estate trough."

Still, this has been a tough year.

Troop Real Estate is projecting $1.2 billion in sales this year, compared with $1.9 billion last year.

"Many of my agents are struggling a little bit, and they've had to take outside jobs," Troop said.

Conejo Valley prices steady

Sales are down throughout the county, but in some pockets, the median price has held steady.

Conejo Valley's median price was $777,778 in October, unchanged from the same period a year ago, according to the Conejo Valley Association of Realtors. But sales for the area totaled 68 last month, down from 116 a year ago.

In California, the median price fell 9.9 percent, from $552,020 in October 2006 to $497,110 last month.

"Financing issues have dogged entry-level buyers since early 2007, but they spilled over into the middle and upper-tier markets in the last few months," CAR President William E. Brown, said in a release.

"The decline in sales at the upper end of the market contributed to a significant decline in the statewide median price as even well-qualified borrowers had difficulty securing financing."

Meanwhile, the state's home sales decreased 40.2 percent in October compared with the year before.

The Los Angeles-based trade organization forecasts further weakness in sales over the next few months as the liquidity crisis plays out, Leslie Appleton-Young, CAR vice president and chief economist, said in a statement.

Nationwide, the median last month declined to $207,800, a 5.1 percent drop from a year ago, the biggest year-over-year price decline on record, the National Association of Realtors reported.

On the Net:

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

CA VCS auction

Ventura County


The pitch was too hard for Marta Cardenas to resist. After all, who wouldn't want to save a few hundred thousand dollars on a new home.

"I'm curious," said Cardenas, as she wandered around a model home at Westwinds, a development where 42 new homes will be auctioned off Sunday. "I just wanted to see if it was for real."

The developer and the company charged with selling the single-family homes hope Cardenas isn't the only one whose interest is piqued by the prospect of nabbing a highly discounted home. The houses are in a gated community with 150 homes off of Saviers Road, near West Pleasant Valley Road in South Oxnard.

On Sunday, Kennedy Wilson Auction Group will offer the homes for sale, beginning with minimum bids of $295,000 to $375,000. The homes this summer were priced from $537,000 to $619,000.

"Basically, it's driven by the market," said Rhett Winchell, president of the Beverly Hills-based auction firm. "Sales have slowed over the last year, so builders are looking for other options."

Kennedy Wilson, which has offices around Ventura County, is holding a similar auction Dec. 9, featuring nine high-end homes in Santa Barbara. Minimum bids on those homes — listed at up to $1.8 million — are $595,000, according to the company.

In early November, the company sold all 45 condos remaining in a Benicia development and the remaining seven homes in a Pinole project. Some of those Northern California properties sold for $100,000 less than what they'd sold for in the summer. The company also plans to auction homes later this month in Colorado.

The auction has the potential of allowing the developer to clear its unsold homes in 30 days, instead of a year or two it might otherwise take in the current market.

While auctions are typically associated with distressed properties, Winchell said his company has done these types of sales since opening in 1977. But it's become much more common in the past year as the real estate market has stalled.

"I would say it's dramatically increased over the last year," Winchell said.

The company spends about a month "educating people" about the process. That includes a seminar — one was held Sunday. In addition, potential buyers must register and pre-qualify, showing that they can afford the homes. The registration deadline is Thursday.

On the day of the auction, there will be a dry run, giving bidders a sense of how the process works.

"It's very open and transparent for the buyer," said Winchell. "It's a great thing for them because they determine the price."

Nationwide, home prices in several markets have seen some of their steepest declines in years. Ventura County's median price for new and existing homes and condominiums fell to $535,000 in October, a 9.3 percent decline from the same month in 2006.

The sagging market has also been dogged by tighter lending rules, making it difficult for those who are ready to buy, said Gustavo Ramirez, owner of Realty World/Adelante Mortgage in Oxnard.

"In years past, all you needed is a pulse to get a loan," said Ramirez, who has been in the industry for 20 years. "That's changed. Lenders are much more careful now."

In the case of the auction, the seller is offering financing through Republic Mortgage Home Loans or Wachovia with a $5,000 credit toward closing costs. In addition, some buyers might be eligible for $10,000 from the city of Oxnard's affordable housing and rehabilitation program.

Developers typically carry a burden on the loans they use to build. The longer the homes sit unsold, the more they pay.

Mark Schneipp, of California Economic Forecast in Goleta, said done right, the auction is the purest distillation of what the true market value of the homes is at this time.

In essence the auction could "establish the new market value" for homes in that part of Oxnard, he said.
Comments

Posted by smithjc on November 28, 2007 at 12:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)

too close to aleric street for me.

Posted by radioceleb99 on November 28, 2007 at 4:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Everyday more Economist’s like Robert J. Shiller are expressing concern that the threat of a recession is coming, but there are plenty of other clues that we are facing unprecedented risks. Consider publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trusts ( REIT). Over the last few years most REIT’s performed extremely well. But the fundamentals are deteriorating and the trading values that took years to build could potentially be wiped out in as many months by the those nasty stock market vultures and fast buck artists commonly known as short sellers. Take Equity One (ticker: EQY) as an example of the perfect storm. Equity One is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. While Equity One’s exposure is nationwide it is based in Florida and so is a huge chunk of its portfolio. The double whammy facing Equity One is that unlike a diversified REIT it primarily invests in “retail” real estate. Equity One disclosed in the latest supplement to it’s quarterly report that its overall vacancy rate is already over 6%, but the shocker is the fact that the rate almost doubles (to a little over 12% vacancy) when the tenants shop is less 10,000 sq ft. The real danger for Equity One is that this group of tenants represents over 70% of Equity One’s shopping center revenue. When you consider that less than 30% of Equity One’s current shopping center tenants are Anchor’s (defined as having over 10,000 sq ft.) you really get goose bumps because at least the bigger retailers have the capital reserves to weather the storm. …And you thought only Realtors and builders had it bad.
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Monday, November 26, 2007

CA CC Tines dfs 2

Contra Costa Times.


SUISUN CITY-- Roiesha Scott, 30, sat on her dark leather sofa, holding her 2-week-old baby, and said it was her fault.

"Now I wish I had asked more questions and done a lot more market research," she said. "As soon as we moved into the house, the values were going down. I feel like I put my family in a predicament."

Scott and her husband Joseph, 27, were served with a notice of default in September and put their house on Tea Rose Court up for sale in late October for $400,000. They bought the home in March 2006 for $515,000 and, because of a job change, now can't afford monthly payments.

A notice of default means homeowners have 90 days to pay their lender or else their home may be sold to the highest bidder on the steps of city hall or the courthouse. About one in 43 homeowners in Solano County went into foreclosure from July to September, enough to affect almost every neighborhood in the county of 411,680.

According to DataQuick Information Systems, 45.9 percent of California homeowners escaped foreclosure by making catch-up payments, refinancing or selling their homes. Last year, that number was 80.9 percent.

Because many people like the Scotts are losing their homes, it can have economic consequences for the entire county, including lower property values and taxes, which could mean less public services and fewer jobs.

And it's not just the county. The Legislative Analyst's Office announced this month that lower-than-expected property tax revenues
Advertisement
would contribute to an $8 billion shortfall for the state's general fund.

Since January, Solano County consistently has had among the top 10 highest rates of foreclosure in the country. As of September, it ranked eighth in the nation, just below Cape Coral-Fort Myers, Fla., and above Las Vegas, according to RealtyTrac.

"It has had some impact on our social system," said Solano County Supervisor Barbara Kondylis. "I know anecdotally that some people are ending up on the streets."

Kondylis said she doesn't know what other effects await the county, but she expects there will be some. "I know it's what the governor's office is predicting," she said.

Solano County is one of the most affordable counties in the Bay Area, with median home sale prices ranging from $325,000 in Rio Vista to $525,000 in Benicia, according to DataQuick. The county median is $391,750.

The numbers also show what caused the problems so many saw in the county. In September 2006, the median home price in Fairfield was $505,000. In September of this year, that price dropped to $386,000, the biggest drop of any city in Solano County.

Much of the drop, according to DataQuick analyst Andrew LePage, was based primarily on August's credit crisis, when loans of more than $417,000, called jumbo loans, jumped past an 8 percent interest rate. It was in response to the lending industry's cash being tied up in defaulting loans or mortgage-backed securities that weren't paying off -- essentially few lenders had cash and thus were charging a premium to use it.

Loans of $417,000 and less are federally insured, but in jumbo loans the lender must assume the risk. The jump in interest rates and subsequent higher pricing reflected that risk for lenders.

Unfortunately, that made jumbo loans harder to get and more expensive, often killing contracts or causing buyers to look elsewhere.

Dark present, bright future

Despite suffering a slumping housing market, Solano County's future looks bright even if the next few years could be rough.

"Solano County has really attracted quite a bit of business in the last decade or two, and that will keep its economy from going into a tailspin," said Cynthia Kroll, senior regional economist for UC Berkeley's Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics. "It has a growing industrial base that has provided a lot of resources for the public sector."

Because of Proposition 13, she said, the property taxes should be stable because most homes are assessed below market value except the most recently sold homes.

"Some people in older homes will sell and those values will go up. Those two factors combine and keep the county tax base," she said.

Lance Houser, assistant assessor recorder of Solano County, said that there has never been a history of property taxes dropping. "What will happen is that the rate of increase won't be as great," he said.

In 1990, Houser said, the recession took a toll but taxes still rose 1.9 percent. In 2005, tax revenues increased 14 percent, and they increased 10 percent in 2006.

"Even this year we'll have an increase in the 4 (percent) to 6 percent range," he said. "The assessment roll isn't going to go negative."

Lower tax revenue, however, can scuttle planning for cities and other public agencies that relied on overly optimistic projections or sales taxes, which also are dwindling.

"Most cities and counties have specific salary increases for their labor pool or a cost-of-living raise," Kroll said. "There's not a lot of flexibility there."

That could mean layoffs or hiring freezes, and it may affect Solano County more than Contra Costa or Alameda counties.

"As prices drop in the core, the more peripheral areas are hit harder," Kroll said. "That's where the more affordable homes were built and more of the subprime loans were made."

Scott was disappointed about losing her Suisun City home but remained optimistic about her family's future in Solano County. "I guess this was more of a learning experience," she said. "I think I'd rather rent for a while."

Vacaville

Cinzia Accardi, 32, said she doesn't regret helping out her brother by putting her name on his loan. "But I do regret not doing enough research on the broker and our loan," she said, sitting in her Vacaville townhouse.

The broker was a "friend of a friend" who talked them into a refinance to remodel the home, giving the Vacaville house a $700,000 appraisal. The $168,000 refinancing loan adjusted for a higher interest rate after about three months, she said, making monthly payments more than $5,000.

The situation was made worse when both siblings lost their well-paying jobs in a family business six months ago. Accardi, once an operations manager, now runs a home-based business creating gift baskets and luxury bath and body products.

She was served with a notice of default in September, informing her she has 90 days to make arrangements to pay or lose the house.

The home her brother lived in on Rambleton Drive is for sale for $435,000, $100,000 less than he paid for it in April 2005. With added upgrades made with a refinance in 2006, Accardi said the amount of money lost is more than $200,000.

After dropping the price of the home several times, at $435,000 she and her brother have a qualified buyer. Now it's only a question of whether their lender will approve the short sale or decide to foreclose on the house in December.

Rio Vista

In Rio Vista, financial problems are compounded for several homeowners because they are now competing with Trilogy at Rio Vista, the developer of an over-55 community, which dropped prices on new, upgraded homes by $150,000 to $200,000."

Value has dropped tremendously," said Juanita Ruiz Simmons, 58, who runs a cleaning business to pay her adjustable-rate mortgage. "We're having a hard time selling homes because of what Shea Homes did ... They still have older models, and new buyers can buy them for less than what we paid or less than we could sell for."

The county assessor and recorder reduced property taxes on about 300 homes there, and Houser said it was the county's hot spot of reassessed taxes.

According to Steve Hextell, general manager of Trilogy at Rio Vista, Shea Homes is doing nothing different from other builders in Northern California by dropping prices and offering free upgrades.

"Sales have been scaled back dramatically from what it was two years ago. We have less profit on our homes," he said. "This housing market isn't controlled by Shea Homes."

Hextell said that Shea continues to advertise and bring people into the community who may look at resale homes. New, single-story homes are available at the development starting in the high $200,000s.

"Most people need to understand this is not Shea-caused, but an overall market issue," he said.

Ruiz Simmons and her husband, Jim Simmons, 69, moved into their home in June 2000 for $225,000. The couple refinanced into last year from a 15-year fixed rate with a monthly payment of $1,700 a month.

Contacted by someone they both thought was representing their lender because they used similar letterhead, they agreed to a refinance in September 2006. But it wasn't their lender, Countrywide. It turned out to be a loan agent from Absolute Mortgage in Shingle Springs who sold them a wholesale option-ARM loan now administered by Wachovia.

"We didn't understand it until we got it in the mail. We were floored actually -- just to pay the interest and principal was around $2,400 a month," she said. "We called them and the broker was like, 'We thought you knew what you were getting into.'"

Ruiz Simmons said their plan was to move from Benicia and enjoy retirement without having to work. That has changed. "Now I run a cleaning business to make ends meet, and it all goes to the overhead of the house," she said.

Neighbor Milian Correa, 61, and her husband, Victor, 57, left Oakland when they bought their home in 2002.

Soon the two put money down on a house and three years later traded up to a newer, upgraded $540,000 home in 2005.

In the past few years, her husband invested heavily in real estate, leveraging loans and properties. Once the appreciation stopped, so did most of his income, and Correa realized in April that they couldn't afford their two mortgages of $2,700 a month.

"Nobody would refi it or change my payments," she said.

Correa, who lived off her pension from Alameda County, started working as a server at the Trilogy clubhouse and then cleaned houses. In October, after six months of cleaning houses, she stopped because the work was too physically demanding. She decided it wasn't worth it, especially when she could rent a home nearby for $1,200.

"I came to terms with the whole thing. For my sanity and health it was the best thing to do anyway," she said. She hasn't made a payment since September.

She organized a short sale with lender SunTrust Mortgage, and she and her husband accepted an offer for $340,000. They are waiting for approval from their lender.

Vallejo

Homeowner Barak Engel called the $495,000 price for his home "the last option before the nuclear option."

The nuclear option means walking away from the home. "You get a little bit of a ding on the credit and then it goes away," Engel said.

According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, about 21 percent of defaulted prime loans and 15 percent of defaulted subprime loans were on non-owner-occupied homes, in which someone walked away from a second home.

Engel, 35, has a home in El Sobrante he bought in August after a job change and hoped to sell his Vallejo home. But even with $100,000 in upgrades, his home in Glen Cove, a tony enclave in east Vallejo, isn't selling. So he dropped the price to $495,000 but thinks his house is getting lost amid the area's foreclosures and short sales.

He said he blamed Vallejo's housing glut. According to Realtor.com, as of Wednesday there were 1,729 properties for sale in Vallejo.

"With more than 1,500 listings, it's a crapshoot," said Engel, who owns a data security consulting company in San Pablo. "Is anyone going to look at my house or not? And how do I get this message to people?"

So he took his case to Craigslist:

"I will admit it; we got caught by the insanity," his ad read.

"One moment our house is worth $625,000. Then we spend over six months and over $60,000 updating it ... because we loved the street, our neighbors, the location, and were going to stay," he wrote. "So here is the deal. We owe $495,000 on this house. We are not greedy. I just want to stop paying so much every month on both houses. I don't want to have it foreclosed on, even though we could technically simply walk away and be none (the worse.) I don't think it's honorable."

The ad has earned Engel some interest, but no solid offers.

Barbara E. Hernandez covers real estate. Reach her at 925-952-5063 or bhernandez@bayareanewsgroup.com.

EDITOR'S NOTE:

Reporters John Simerman and Barbara E. Hernandez analyzed Bay Area foreclosure hot spots in the East Bay and North Bay for a two-day series:

SUNDAY: Foreclosure clusters are ravaging East Bay streets and neighborhoods, gouging property values as abandoned houses become targets for squatters, thieves and drug dealers.

MONDAY: Solano is among the counties hardest hit by the mortgage meltdown, with foreclosures affecting one in every 43 homes.

WHY IT HAPPENED

1. Dropping homes sale and prices

Homeowners couldn't beat their one-, two- or three-year adjustable-rate loans or get out of it by selling.

2. Use of adjustable-rate and other exotic loans

A ticking time bomb for those homeowners who can't afford more than the lowest possible payment.

3. No equity

Widespread 100 percent financing and dropping prices created no equity to tap into to refinance into an affordable loan.

WHY IT CONTINUES

1. Builders outcompete resale homes

Builders drop prices sharply to move inventory; homeowners don't or can't.

2. Too much inventory on the market

There are more than 1,700 listings in Solano County.

3. High-cost loans, especially those more than $417,000 (jumbo)

Because of the credit crunch, fewer lenders want to assume risk, so it makes them more expensive.

4. Fewer buyers.

Whether because of high-priced loans or less confidence in the market, buyers are taking more time.

Sunday, November 25, 2007

CA CC Tines dfs

The Contra Costa Times.


Reporters John Simerman and Barbara Hernandez analyzed Bay Area foreclosure hot spots in the East Bay and North Bay for a two day series:

SUNDAY: Foreclosure clusters are ravaging East Bay streets and neighborhoods, gouging property values as abandoned houses become targets for squatters, thieves and drug dealers.

MONDAY: Solano is among the counties hardest hit by the mortgage meltdown, with foreclosures affecting one in every 43 homes.

Before the lawns turn pale and the weeds flare up and the newspapers litter the driveways, the children know the score.

In southeast Antioch, where a swarm of East Bay foreclosures makes its thickest nest, the children on Catanzaro Way live among a grove of real estate signs that turn like autumn leaves, from "For Sale" to "Reduced Price" to bright "Auction" yellow.

The signs mark houses left vacant by owners with no equity or patience or much hope to mend their blistered credit. Ten vacant houses run along a single block, where two-story homes sold for as much as half a million dollars in 2005, but no one here wants to guess what they would fetch now.

Some are afraid to look. Local agents say home values in Antioch have slipped a solid 30 percent from their highs. Now, 1,200 homes in the city are listed for sale. Banks own a third of them. Last month, fewer than 40 sold.

One home on Catanzaro that sold at more than its $445,000 asking price in late 2005 sat for 10 months this year at $322,900,
Advertisement
Click Here!
said listing agent Jim Mann. Nobody bit. It sold at auction last week for an as-yet undisclosed amount.

The driveways of some vacant houses on the street now serve as neighborhood parking lots.

"I'm kind of embarrassed to have my friends come over," said 15-year-old Angelica Berrera. "We used to come outside and have a good time. It used to be nice. Now it's ..."

"Empty," said her sister, Natalie.

"All these houses, no one watches them because nobody lives in them," added Clarissa Juarez, 13. Auction signs frame her driveway. Across the street stand two other foreclosures. Her house is surrounded by nobody.

"It's kind of quiet," she said. "Too quiet."

The street is among several across the East Bay where foreclosures have gathered in clusters, with as many as six bank-owned houses on a single block, according to a Times analysis of sale data from DataQuick.

From East Oakland to North Richmond to Discovery Bay, several newer developments, along with urban enclaves that got a jolt of renewal during the housing boom, now bow under the weight of abandoned and foreclosed homes.

Most, but not all, of these clusters crop up in lower-income areas, where studies have shown the subprime loan drive at its most rampant.

Much of the outcry over the mortgage crisis has centered on the damage to borrowers and financial markets. Only lately is attention turning to the burden on those left behind: sinking property values, the eyesore of boarded-up windows and doors, watchful neighbors replaced by drug dealers and squatters, safety fears, frayed neighborhoods.

A report released this month by the Center for Responsible Lending put a number on the "spillover" cost of the foreclosure crisis: $223 billion nationwide.

It ranked Alameda and Contra Costa among the 25 hardest-hit counties in the nation, with a combined $5 billion in lost value to nearby homes. Before it's over, the report says, Alameda, Contra Costa and Solano counties will see nearly 15,000 foreclosures, with an additional 740,000 homeowners feeling the bite.

The estimates are based on research showing a nearly 1 percent average decline in values within a few blocks of a foreclosure. In hotbeds, the drop multiplies.

It's "like a disease epidemic," said the center's CEO, Martin Eakes, who expects the ripple to be felt for two to three years. "The losses are extending to neighbors and entire communities. ... We've only begun to see the impact."

Among recent signs of trouble in the East Bay:

# Building officials are scurrying to board up empty houses to keep squatters and drug dealers at bay. With electricity, garbage and water service turned off and winter coming, officials worry that squatters will set those houses aflame while trying to stay warm. A handful of foreclosed houses, overrun with rotting trash and human waste, have been condemned as hazards.

# In some areas, thieves rip through the walls of foreclosed homes for wiring and yank out copper plumbing to cash in at recycling centers. Some leave water spewing from pipes around properties.

# Roofing and renovation projects are stalling at condominium complexes across the East Bay, as assessments go unpaid by owners who have walked away or are headed for foreclosure. In one complex in Concord, nearly a dozen units are foreclosed, costing several hundred thousand dollars for badly needed repairs, say homeowners association leaders.

# Vector control specialists say they are finding mosquito breeding grounds in scores of backyard pools as they scour hard-hit neighborhoods for potential West Nile virus threats.

# Counties can expect a tax revenue hit as houses get assessed downward. An October report from a joint congressional committee found that in California, the wave of subprime foreclosures will mean $111 million in lost property tax revenue.

# Some residents on the edge of losing their homes are stripping them inside and out, swiping light fixtures, gates, dishwashers, garbage disposals and air-conditioner units, and leaving behind piles of garbage, old cars and debris.

"It's a last act of defiance against the bank," said Jim Tucker, a code enforcement officer who patrols a large swath of southeast Antioch.

On his rounds one recent afternoon, Tucker pointed out the iron gates and outdoor light fixtures that the owner swiped before the bank took the house. Across the street was another foreclosure, with the telltale sun-baked yard.

At another, a two-story brown stucco house on Asilomar Drive, Tucker had recently boarded up the windows and doors. The occupants were dealing drugs from the house, he said.

Their garbage service was shut off, so they stacked bags of trash in the back. When he walked to the rear of the house, Tucker found one board ripped off, a sign that someone had returned.

"It's cat-and-mouse," he said.

With the market awash in houses, neighbors fear the badly kept ones will sit, boarded up, for years. Some banks have responded by cleaning up properties. But most "don't want to lose any more money than they already have," said Tucker, who tries to convince them that letting a house go south will cost more.

East Bay cities often attach liens on the house for cleanup and other costs, to be paid eventually by the next owner.

Code officials are getting more aggressive to ensure that property values, and tax revenues, don't dwindle further. In Antioch, for instance, officials no longer send gentle courtesy notices before citations and fines, said Denise Skaggs, head of code enforcement.

To owners about to lose their homes, it's not much of a threat, she said. Lawns still go untended. Junk cars fill driveways. Utilities lapse and the homes lose electricity and water. Some residents run generators or cop power from neighbors.

"I'm losing leverage with people. They say, 'Go ahead and put a lien on my property. I'm losing it anyway,'" she said. "Threats have increased. This last year you've seen the tightness, that edge. People are real quick to threaten us. We don't knock on doors anymore."

A Times analysis found that the top six hot spots for single-family home foreclosures in the East Bay, from January 2006 through September 2007, all were in Contra Costa.

Antioch led the way, with 25 foreclosures per 1,000 single-family homes. San Pablo, Pittsburg, Brentwood and Oakley followed. In Alameda County, Oakland tops the list.

The two Antioch ZIP codes -- 94531 and 93509 -- led all others in the number of foreclosures, followed by Pittsburg/Bay Point's 94565, Brentwood's 94513 and Oakland's 94605, at the base of Interstate 580 and Highway 13 in East Oakland.

There, residents talk about the door-knockers who came by a few years ago, offering loans to older owners. They point now to the homes of longtime neighbors who have quietly left.

"She was kind of private. Her husband had passed. She took a couple loans out. She told me on a Tuesday she was moving out on Thursday," Tyrice Ross said of a neighbor who had lived for 15 years on 75th Avenue, until spring.

"I look up one day, she said she needed help getting a U-Haul truck," Jane Gray said of her next-door neighbor.

On Weld Street in Oakland, Fannie Brown points to foreclosed and abandoned houses, one after the next, near her own.

"This whole block was full and flourishing," said Brown, who works for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN, a housing advocacy group.

"That green house back there, foreclosed. They started breaking into it. That building's been burnt. They went and took all the doors and windows. ... This house right here is up for sale. People squat in 'em."

A study in 2005, based on Chicago data, tied an increase in gang activity, drug dealing, prostitution, arson and rape to some vacant properties.

That study found that each abandoned house can cost municipal agencies hundreds or thousands of dollars in trash removal, utility tax losses and the demolition process, if needed.

Local agencies said they have yet to see a spike in crime in the East Bay. But some worry about the "broken window" theory -- that small signs of blight can draw criminals to a street like shoppers to a post-Thanksgiving sale.

"Part of safety is perception," said Antioch police Chief Jim Hyde. "You're going to see ... not only the weeds growing, abandoned vehicles being parked on the location, but also loitering and the possibility of people breaking in, usually to the back of the residence, to be squatters."

The numbers in Antioch tell a brutal tale: In the first six months of 2006, 35 homes in the city went through foreclosure. In the six months ended Sept. 30, foreclosures took 472 homes. The pace in the city is now more than 90 foreclosures a month.

Some of that, agents say, stems from aggressive builders offering huge perks -- including two years of mortgage payments in some cases -- to get buyers into homes. When the money runs out, often so does the ability of owners to make the payments, they say.

"This is the worst I've seen in 30 years," said Mann. "This foreclosure process points out the weak spots. We've got certain areas of the market that were weak before, and it got real hot when the market was really booming, and everyone forgot where the weak spots were."

The effect on property tax revenues will not be known until after the new year, when county officials tally the damage, mostly from properties getting assessed downward in and around newer developments. County officials say they expect lower-than-normal tax revenue increases.

Alameda County, which saw an 8 percent increase in property tax revenue this year, is expecting that to drop to about 5 percent, said chief deputy assessor Russ Hall. Contra Costa County Assessor Gus Kramer said he expects a similar slide from the 8.9 increase in the tax roll last year.

Many foreclosures, Hall noted, are to longtime homeowners who refinanced; despite the pain for them, the assessments on their former houses will go up with a sale.

Cities with a higher concentration of new developments will feel the pinch more. Last year, for instance, Brentwood saw a 29 percent increase in property tax revenue. This year, it was 13 percent. Next year could be dead flat, said Pamela Ehler, the city's finance director.

The money is split among the city, schools, fire service, the community college, the county and several other tax districts.

In tandem with a $10 billion state budget shortfall, the slowdown is bound to leave a mark in foreclosure hotbeds, said Kramer.

"It'll be more severe in Antioch, Oakley and Brentwood. This affects them directly. There's going to be some real serious belt-tightening by local government," he said.

"Concord, Walnut Creek, Danville are going to do fine. San Ramon's going to be OK ... Richmond and San Pablo are getting spanked and put to bed without their dinner."

In North Richmond, an anti-blight team funded by Richmond and Contra Costa County is trying to keep up with an onslaught of abandoned and foreclosed homes.

The long-beleaguered community got a big boost from the housing boom, as investors bought up land and renovated or rebuilt. Some got caught in the downturn and walked away.

Builders spawned new gated developments with homes selling for $600,000. Those same homes now are offered in the $400,000 range.

At least a few homes and apartment houses on every North Richmond street sit vacant, either foreclosed or abandoned. The homeless move from one to the next, officials say. Some of the houses serve as de facto trash dumps, others toilets.

"A vacant house is a great place if you're homeless and a drug addict and it's wintertime," said Maria Benjamin, program director for Community Housing and Development Corp. of North Richmond. "It's getting cold outside. They're fire hazards.

"We were celebrating, thinking it was changing. Now, why move into a neighborhood like this when you can move someplace else with so many houses (on the market)?"

Contra Costa fire Marshal Richard Carpenter said the agency has problems with abandoned homes and expects more as the foreclosure crisis drags on.

"If a person is intent, they're just going to go to the foreclosure section of the newspaper: 'Yup, that home's available,'" said Carpenter. "I'm sure we're going to see more of the clandestine drug labs get in there."

In some areas, authorities have started using thicker, more-secure boards attached to the house frame to keep squatters from ripping them out.

"It's a blight issue, and you're creating a place for people addicted to drugs to go in. They will just throw stuff out into the yard. That's how we find out about them. There's a dishwasher and trash all over the front of the yard," said Sgt. Darren Monahan, a Richmond code enforcement officer.

"I ran across one person, he was going to lose his house but he still kept coming back to the property to take care of it because he didn't want to affect his neighbors. He wanted to keep it clean," Monahan said. "That's pretty rare."

Authorities can clean up the outside of a home but have limited powers on the inside. With due notice they can demolish a home if it presents a hazard. Sometimes it takes months to figure out who actually owns it, said county building inspector Vincent Caballero.

"You see some homes where you've just got human feces in there, just really gross. All the copper's gone. It's trashed," said Jose Avila, a county environmental health officer who works in North Richmond.

As financial analysts plumb for the bottom of the swoon, local housing advocates say they can keep searching.

A deluge of discounted houses threatens a second, bigger wave of foreclosures, advocates say, as those prices make it harder for neighboring homeowners to refinance.

"You think about yourself being the next person," said Patience White, a nurse who lives with her family on Catanzaro Way. "It's sad when you're driving in, looking around. Nobody is watching out for you. Now I just rush in my house."

Reach John Simerman at 925-943-8072 or jsimerman@bayareanewsgroup.com.

online

To view an online map of foreclosures neighborhood-by-neighborhood, go to: http://www.contracostatimes.com/search/ci_7342417

RePrintPrint Email Return to Top
Comments
Some comments posted here may be reviewed before they are displayed, including submissions with hyperlinks or with language that is flagged by word filters. Please keep your comments respectful of others by avoiding name-calling and other inappropriate remarks.



Recent Comments
Be the first to post a comment using the form below

Post Your Comment
Name:
Growth

# online
# Iron Horse Trail ramps must go

Friday, November 23, 2007

CA it's a big bust

Mercury News


Bay Area food banks have had a little less to be thankful for this year.

Although many of the local charities are seeing a record need for basic food items like peanut butter and pasta - not to mention holiday hams and turkeys - donations have been lagging. And food bank workers are nervous, with some calling this the worst season for hunger since the dot-com bust rocked the valley years ago.

"Our pantries are now empty," said Carol Patterson, a spokeswoman for CityTeam Ministries in San Jose, which serves food to the hungry year-round. The agency distributed some 4,000 Thanksgiving food boxes in Silicon Valley this week - but had to dip into its savings to buy many of the meals. Not enough food was donated, she said.

"What we're seeing is because of foreclosures and high rent, our donors are going through some hardships themselves. We're seeing a lower amount of donated food," she said.

It's a similar story at the Second Harvest Food Bank of Santa Clara and San Mateo counties. The organization, which feeds 163,000 Bay Area residents each month, was hoping to raise $5 million and receive 1.9 million pounds of food from October to the start of the new year. To date, the agency is only about a quarter of the way to meeting that goal, and workers expect they'll actually need 10 percent more than initially expected to meet all the local need.

"We have a lot of people who don't know where their next meal is going to come from," spokeswoman
Advertisement
Lynn Crocker said. "We realize that everybody who needs food is not getting it."

Michael Bute, a 47-year-old former printer and truck driver now living at InnVision's shelter on Montgomery Street, said the influx of needy residents could be blamed on too many folks counting on their homes for income.

"Everyone is depending on the real estate to be a big boom, and it's a big bust," said Bute, as he took a walk after a Thanksgiving meal at InnVision.

Others at InnVision, which provides shelter to several dozen men and women, said they've encountered more working poor these days.

Cornell, a guest of an InnVision resident Thursday who wanted only his first name printed, said he frequents a number of food pantries. He said he's meeting more people who are working but need free food because increases in rent and the cost of living have outstripped raises at their low-wage jobs.

"It's either a place to stay or something to eat," he said.

Robert Lee, a 47-year-old with back and heart disabilities, said he's not surprised food banks are short of donations, saying government at all levels has been cutting back on funding for services such as shelters or grants for permanent housing, which he said he finally got after two years.

"The resources are gone," he said.

With just a month to go until Christmas and Kwanzaa, food collectors are wondering how happy the holidays ultimately will be for many of their down-and-out clients.

Indeed, according to data that was collected by the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research in 2005, an estimated 1.1 million people in Santa Clara, San Mateo, Alameda and Santa Cruz counties don't know how they can put enough food on the table while also making ends meet. The group conducts its hunger audit every two years.

The Alameda County Community Food Bank has seen a 46 percent increase in needy families since last year. The agency got a record number of calls this week - and they weren't simply from people in search of a free holiday turkey.

"It was, 'We need a box of cereal.' Or, 'We need food for our family just to feed them lunch and breakfast today,' " said Suzan Bateson, executive director. "We haven't seen a spike like this since the dot-com bomb."

In any given week, the Alameda County Community Food Bank serves 40,000 people - and 14,000 of them are children, Bateson said.

Single mothers and their children tend to be disproportionately hungry, but even some families with two wage earners are struggling this year.

"We know that families are underemployed, people are not earning enough to make ends meet," Bateson said. "And when you have a spike in the cost of gasoline, that really affects the people we serve."

Food banks are in need of monetary donations - every dollar given to Second Harvest can help provide two meals - as well as basic food items. Canned soups, stew, chili and tuna are needed, as are canned fruits, vegetables, peanut butter, pasta, spaghetti sauce and low-sugar cereals like oatmeal.

But even if local residents get into the holiday spirit, giving enough to fill local tables this Christmas season, there's always January, when the need doesn't go away but the donations really begin to dwindle.

"The problem of hunger won't go away once the tinsel, trees, lights and decorations come down," Bateson said. "That's the most sobering thing for all of us to recognize."

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

CA mothball

Wall Street Journal

As the glut of unsold home remains stubbornly high and housing demand slides, home builders face a dilemma: to sell, or not to sell?

Lennar Corp., for one, has joined the "not to sell" camp at its development in Orange County, Calif. The Miami company plans to finish building 259 homes -- the first phase of a 1,100-unit development in Irvine -- but it has decided not to sell any of them until the constrained mortgage market and swollen housing inventory improves.
OFF THE MARKET

• What's New: Rather than match rivals' price cuts, Lennar will mothball some Orange County, Calif., projects.
• Tough Questions: Builders must decide whether the losses from discounts outweigh the costs of carrying properties on their books.
• Rising Pressure: Builders are facing overhead expenses and increasing pressure to service their debt.

"We are better off holding off on sales at this asset and not discounting as steeply as the market is discounting right now," says Emile Haddad, Lennar's chief investment officer, who oversees the company's large West Coast projects. "It doesn't make sense for us to sell it in an environment that as strained as it is right now."

Mr. Haddad says Lennar will monitor the Orange County market on a monthly basis, but "this might be put on hold for the whole year of 2008." Lennar also is halting development of a large community planned near Angel Stadium of Anaheim, despite preparing the land to support the project.

Analysts expect more builders to mothball projects in the coming months, as they decide that the losses from selling homes at huge discounts are greater than the costs of carrying properties on their books. But it's not an easy decision. Builders are facing increasing pressure from lenders to service their debt and also have overhead expenses to support.

"It's the next natural step in the evolution" of the housing downturn, says Nishu Sood, a home-builder analyst at Deutsche Bank. "This normally happens during a recession when you just don't have a base of demand. But it's like that now. In some of these locations, you just can't give a house away."

Some builders don't have the luxury of waiting for a brighter day. The more highly leveraged companies are slashing prices to move inventory to generate cash and pay down debt. This fall, builder Hovnanian Enterprises Inc., based in Red Bank, N.J., offered discounts on homes of as much as 30%, while Standard Pacific Corp., of Irvine, Calif., has been offering discounts and other incentives of as much as 25% on certain homes. Both companies say their recent, heavily marketed discounts have sparked sales in the difficult market.

Lennar Chief Executive Stuart Miller recently called some price cuts "unrealistic and maybe even ridiculous."

"The market has just deteriorated more and more. We don't want to go below a certain floor, and that is the floor of reasonableness," Mr. Miller told analysts on a conference call in late September.

Outside some of its Orange County developments, Lennar continues to discount homes in many markets to make sales under increasingly tough conditions. In the third quarter, Lennar delivered 7,636 homes at an average price $296,000, including discounts or amenities of $46,000 per home. That compares with an average price of $316,000, including $35,900 in discounts and amenities in the year-earlier period.

Lennar's move in Orange County is unusual in that the company is mothballing homes. Builders typically mothball partially developed or undeveloped land because vacant homes require watching. One alternative would be for builders to sell their land instead, but that market is even more dismal than the one for housing. Recent land transactions in California, Phoenix and Southeast Florida, while few in number, have fetched discounts of 70% and 80% on finished lots, according to Zelman & Associates, an independent housing research firm.

"They have all this land that they need to turn over, so they keep building," says Paul Puryear, an analyst at Raymond James & Associates. "We would recover so much quicker if you could just turn it off, but you can't turn it off."

Lennar may be in a better position than others to mothball certain developments and land. The company was one of the first large builders to discount homes through much of 2006, burning through its unsold inventory and generating cash. At the time, the company was criticized for softening prices, but "it ended up being the right move given the subsequent deterioration in the market," says UBS analyst David Goldberg. Although it posted a $514 million third-quarter loss, the company ended the period with a net debt-to-capital ratio of 36% compared with an industry average of 43%, Mr. Goldberg says.
[Open House]

Luxury builder Toll Brothers Inc., based in Horsham, Pa., said last week that it is willing to hold prices, even if that means generating few sales. Mr. Sood says such a strategy amounts to the "effective mothballing" of certain developments. "They might have a salesperson in these communities, but it's effectively fallow," Mr. Sood says. "They are selling less than one home a month" in some communities.

Chief Executive Robert Toll said builders with cash problems may need to reduce prices more aggressively. "But fortunately, for the time being, that's not us," Mr. Toll told analysts on a conference call last week.

Builders continue to put up new homes, though in far fewer numbers than during the housing boom. According to the Census Bureau, builders started construction on 79,400 single-family and 21,200 multifamily homes in September, which was down 33% and 31%, respectively, from the same month a year earlier. Housing starts are off by about 48% from a peak in January 2006.

Considering there are too many houses already looking for buyers, it might seem surprising that builders are building at all. But unlike auto manufacturers that can ramp production up or down in a matter of weeks, it can take years for a housing development to makes its way through the development pipeline. By the time the builder has spent money putting in roads and sidewalks, the housing market may have turned.

"Many builders are stuck between a rock and hard place," says Jonathan Dienhart, director of published research at Hanley Wood Market Intelligence, a housing research firm in Costa Mesa, Calif. "They can't make money by building, and they can't make money by not building. They have to choose the lesser of two evils."

Lennar's Mr. Haddad says the builder had to finish constructing the first phase of its Irvine project, called Central Park West, where the mix of condos and town homes had an average price of $700,000. "You create a stigma for a community if it's only half built," Mr. Haddad says. The 14 buyers who signed contracts for the 259 homes got their deposits back.

A spokesman for Lennar's partner in the project, San Francisco-based Stockbridge Real Estate Fund, said, "We are under no pressure to sell strong assets into a weak market, especially where the market's long-term prospects remain favorable." Mr. Haddad says Stockbridge has a larger equity stake in the project than Lennar, but he declined to elaborate.

Mr. Haddad says the lender on the project, Britain's Barclays PLC, is "fully aware of what we are doing." Barclays declined to comment.

Write to Michael Corkery at michael.corkery@wsj.com

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

FT fire sale

Financial Times

The risk of fire sales of mortgage-backed securities was rising on Tuesday after rating downgrades pushed a clutch of complex debt vehicles into default, threatening a further escalation of the turmoil caused by the subprime mortgage meltdown.

The prospect of forced sales comes as a US Treasury-backed plan for a “superfund” to buy up distressed mortgage securities appears to have stalled.
EDITOR’S CHOICE
Lex: Bank write-offs - Nov-06
Threat of forced sales grows for CDOs - Nov-06
Banks are braced for months of pressure - Nov-05
Banks hit again as credit fears spread - Nov-02
Jobs growth calms US recession fears - Nov-03
Subprime anxiety hits top index - Oct-26

Rating agencies Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s have received default notices for $5bn worth of the vehicles, known as collateralised debt obligations, giving holders of senior debt the right to sell assets.

“The senior controlling class will typically want to get the hell out and pay themselves back, even if that means selling the underlying securities at a discount,” said Arturo Cifuentes, managing director at fixed-income broker RW Pressprich and a former Moody’s analyst.

The threat of forced sales of mortgage-backed assets has prompted the US Treasury to back the proposal by three top US banks to set up for a $75bn superfund to buy securities from cash-strapped structured investment vehicles.

However, the plan has fallen badly behind schedule with no other banks yet making a firm commitment to join Citigroup, Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase.

Executives at other banks believe the plan has been hurt by the turmoil at Citigroup, which lost its chief executive, Chuck Prince, on Sunday after admitting it faced further mortgage-related writedowns of up to $11bn.

“As far as we can see, it appears dead in the water right now,” said one senior Wall Street banker.

However, one person close to the plan said progress had been made on deciding what assets would be eligible and syndication of the back-up bank lines was set to start late next week.

Some observers fear it might now prove impossible to create the superfund quickly enough to help banks deal with the funding problems dogging SIVs – off-balance sheet entities that use short-term debt to fund longer-dated investments.

Expectations are rising that banks might be forced to provide more help to the SIVs they manage in the coming weeks, to prevent a forced sale of their assets.

Citi, which manages SIVs with about $80bn of assets, had bought $7.6bn of commercial paper issued by its SIVs by October 31, out of a total commitment of $10bn, it disclosed in its quarterly filing with regulators.

Morgan Stanley shares dropped another 2 per cent on Tuesday, for a fall of 20 per cent over the past week, as David Trone, analyst at Fox-Pitt Kelton, said it could face another $6bn of mortgage-related writedowns.

Goldman Sachs again denied rumours that it was about to announce big writedowns.

Mounting investor concern about writedowns of mortgage securities is raising expectations that the Federal Reserve will have to cut interest rates to stop the credit market turmoil from tipping the US economy into a sharp downturn.

These worries helped drive the dollar to new lows against the euro. In turn, this spurred gold prices to jump to a 28-year high and oil to surge above $97 a ­barrel.

Investors also have been worried about the health of US bond insurers, such as MBIA and Ambac, whose central role in the capital markets depends on their high credit ratings.

However, Ambac and MBIA yesterday rose 13 per cent and 7 per cent, respectively, after Ambac and FGIC, another credit insurer, issued statements ­reaffirming their financial strength.

Fitch, the rating agency, warned on Monday that it was reviewing the capital adequacy of the companies to assess whether their AAA ratings were still justified.

Saturday, November 03, 2007

CA OCBJ 2 stories

Orange County

Standard Pacific Corp. hung a big Southern California marketing and sales effort in September on the phrase “Mission Possible” and pulled off 227 home sales during the incentive-laden campaign’s two-week period.

It was a bright spot in an otherwise gloomy third quarter for the Irvine-based homebuilder, the country’s 11th largest homebuilder by sales.

The two-week sale was responsible for nearly 15% of the entire company’s third-quarter new home orders—a contract to buy a Standard Pacific home under construction.

Standard Pacific still is building in cooling housing markets such as Arizona, Nevada, Texas and the Carolinas.

For many on Wall Street, the really hard mission is just beginning.

In late October, Standard Pacific posted a worse-than-expected loss of $119.7 million for the third quarter. Analysts were expecting a loss closer to $100 million.

The company reported revenue of $675 million, down 19% from a year earlier. The figure includes $57 million in land sales. The third-quarter results also included $223.5 million of charges, including write-offs to account for diminishing land values.

The company’s stock took a minimal hit on the news—a rarity for Standard Pacific as of late. But its stock already had lost 80% of its value for the year by October.

The company has the worst-performing stock of the 15 largest publicly traded homebuilders this year, according to a Standard & Poor’s industry index.

After breaking into the Fortune 500 list of biggest American companies in 2006, the company now sports a more modest market value of about $360 million.

Declining market values are the least of Standard Pacific’s problems right now. Analysts are questioning how successfully the company can operate with a heavy debt load that totals close to $2 billion.

The company has spent $124 million so far this year, paying off debt and calls for repayment by creditors for the ventures it has with other developers, according to analysts. Another $60 million in joint venture debt is expected to be retired by the end of this year, while another $80 million in margin calls could be coming too.

“We don’t see how (Standard Pacific) can afford to continue to leak cash or to absorb JV debt,” said Vicki Bryan, analyst for New York-based GimmeCredit, in a research report last week.

Taking a more pessimistic tone, New York-based CreditSights analysts Frank Lee and Sarah Rowin predicted last month that Standard Pacific could be forced to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, due to slow sales and the company’s high debt.

“There has been a lot of speculation that the group of banks on (the company’s) working capital line are not being supportive, and may not be amenable and be patient going forward,” said analyst Ivy Zelman of Beachwood, Ohio-based Zelman and Associates.

Andrew Parnes, chief financial officer for Standard Pacific, says the company has twice this year gone back to its bank group to renegotiate terms of its loans. So far, “the group has been very supportive of our efforts,” he said during the company’s quarterly call with analysts.

Chief Executive Stephen Scarborough said Standard Pacific was continuing to take steps to reduce debt and expenses and plans to generate cash next year.

The company has reduced its employee count from 2,850 at the market’s peak to about 2,000 now. Re-bidding deals with Standard Pacific’s contractors has added about $5,000 worth of savings to every home it builds this year. And another $10,000 in per-home cost savings, or about $4 per square foot, have been identified and are being worked on, he said.

Companywide, Standard Pacific has slashed prices for homes it is selling from 20% to 25% to generate sales. For the most part, that level of price decrease is not being seen in its backyard of Southern California.

“We’ve been operating in the California markets for 40 years, and so our brand is very well established and I believe that it’s a very significant competitive advantage that we have,” Scarborough said. “So we very strongly believe that we do not solely need to compete on price.”

If increased pressure arises from banks to pay down more debt, the company says it won’t resort to an out-and-out fire sale or distressed sale to raise cash, Parnes said.

That said, September’s “Mission Possible” was a big seller in California, in part due to sizable price cuts and other incentives. So far, those local sales have stuck. The cancellation rates for the Mission Possible sales are running about 10%, well below its third-quarter average cancellation rate of 34%.

California orders were also responsible for one of the best items reported last quarter for the company. Standard Pacific said new home orders were up 23% from last year, due to an increase in California orders.

Home deliveries in California were responsible for 28% of the company’s total last quarter, and were behind 45% of its homebuilding revenues.



Orange County

Home sales at Lennar Corp.’s Central Park West development in Irvine are being halted until the housing and mortgage markets show signs of recovery. And new construction at the 1,500-home project is being delayed, the Miami-based company said.

The shift at Central Park West, one of the few big projects to go forward amid the downturn, is the latest sign of the tough environment facing builders in Orange County.

Home sales here in September were down by nearly 40% from a year earlier, and builder concessions are knocking down new home prices by up to 20% in some cases.

It’s also a quick change in plans for Lennar—currently the county’s most active builder. Central Park West is the largest mixed-use development being built on former commercial space in Irvine near John Wayne Airport.

Some 40 projects on the board for the Irvine Business Complex would bring nearly 14,000 homes to the area.

The decision to pull back sales efforts was made last month, said Emile Haddad, Lennar’s chief investment officer who works out of Aliso Viejo.

It follows earlier company decisions to push back construction for Lennar’s two other big OC projects—Platinum Triangle’s A-Town in Anaheim and Irvine’s Great Park.

In Anaheim, Lennar last week opted to scale back the second, smaller planned section of its Platinum Triangle plan, called A-Town Stadium, by some 250 homes.

The big difference in the changes at Irvine is that homebuilding is well under way for Central Park West, the 43-acre site that runs along the San Diego (I-405) Freeway and Jamboree Road.

The first 500 homes at the 43-acre development are under construction and should be completed from January to November.

Officials at Lennar’s Aliso Viejo office—where most of the company’s day-to-day operations are run—haven’t determined when sales will resume for these homes.

The sales pullback also applies for Astoria, the two condominium towers being built on the site by Lennar and Canada’s Intergulf Development Group. Those towers total about 240 homes.

When the remaining 900 homes at Central Park West break ground, along with 90,000 square feet of planned office space and 19,700 square feet of retail space, depends on market conditions, Haddad said. A more concrete decision could be made by year’s end.

No Discounts

The company is opting to postpone sales rather than offload the homes at steep discounts, which is the norm at other projects going up in the county.

Central Park West’s location and unique design should command premium prices, Haddad said. Four of the six home types being built at the project, including the high-rises, have starting prices near or above $1 million. Two other home plans start in the $700,000s, according to Irvine-based Hanley Wood Market Intelligence.

“For that location, the last thing we want to do is engage in a sale program that (emphasizes) heavy discounting,” Haddad said.

Sales to date at Central Park West have been minimal. Not including the high-rises, there have been less than a dozen sales at the project through August, according to data from Hanley Wood.

If a builder can hold off sales now, and afford to keep housing inventory on its books, it might prove to be a smart decision. Factoring in discounts, nearly every new-home sale made in the area these days is being made at a loss, said Rich Knowland, formerly the head of OC operations for Lennar, who now is senior vice president for land developer Pacific Terra Holdings LLC.

Lennar’s decision to delay sales is an unusual one for a publicly traded homebuilder. Most builders would prefer to get their projects sold and off their books once construction begins, even if it requires steep price drops.

Company officials note that projects like Central Park West and the Great Park are typically bought through ventures with a number of well-funded private investors, so the pressure to offload product is not as high as with some other builders.

Lennar bought a controlling stake in the former Parker Hannifin Corp. site in Irvine for about $100 million. It began razing old buildings at the site in mid-2005.

Officials have said that interest from prospective buyers at Central Park West has been encouraging, though sales have lagged to date.

Recent troubles in the mortgage market—making it hard for buyers to get jumbo loans of more than $417,000—haven’t helped.

“Hopefully, the next two months will bring some clarity to the mortgage issue,” Haddad said. “The market will recover, but we don’t know what that period is.”

Friday, November 02, 2007

WSJ ML

Wall Street Journal

Merrill Lynch & Co., in a bid to slash its exposure to risky mortgage-backed securities, has engaged in deals with hedge funds that may have been designed to delay the day of reckoning on losses, people close to the situation said.

The transactions are among the issues likely to be examined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC is looking into how the Wall Street firm has been valuing, or "marking," its mortgage securities and how it has disclosed its positions to investors, a person familiar with the probe said. Regulators are scrutinizing whether Merrill knew its mortgage-related problem was bigger than what it indicated to investors throughout the summer.
SCRAMBLING BULL

• The Issue: Merrill Lynch & Co. has been off-loading some of its mortgage-related assets to hedge funds as part of an effort to cap its exposures.
• Backdrop: Merrill's mortgage assets fueled a $7.9 billion third-quarter write-down, leading to the forced retirement on Tuesday of Chief Executive Stan O'Neal.
• Regulatory Question: Did some of Merrill's recent mortgage asset sales effectively postpone the reckoning for some write-downs?

In one deal, a hedge fund bought $1 billion in commercial paper issued by a Merrill-related entity containing mortgages, a person close to the situation said. In exchange, the hedge fund had the right to sell back the commercial paper to Merrill itself after one year for a guaranteed minimum return, this person said.

While the Merrill-related entity's assets and liabilities weren't on Merrill's own balance sheet, Merrill might have been required to take a write-down if the entity was unable to sell the commercial paper to other investors and suffered losses, the person said. The deal delayed that risk for a year, the person said.

In a statement, a Merrill Lynch spokeswoman said, "We don't comment on specific transactions and we are confident in the appropriateness of our marks."

At issue with any hedge-fund deals is whether there was an attempt by Merrill to sweep problems under the rug through private transactions kept out of view from investors. Some previous scandals, such as the collapse of Enron Corp. and the troubles of Japan's financial system in the 1990s, involved efforts to hide problems through off-balance-sheet transactions.

Ground Zero

Merrill has become ground zero of mortgage problems in the U.S. Last week, the firm announced a $7.9 billion write-down fueled by mortgage-related problems -- one of the largest known Wall Street losses in history -- after projecting just a few weeks earlier that the write-down would be $4.5 billion. Merrill also took a $463 million write-down, net of fees, for deal-related lending commitments, bringing the firm's total third-quarter write-down to $8.4 billion.

A few days after the announcement, it ousted Stan O'Neal, its chief executive. Some analysts and others say they expect Merrill to take additional write-downs of roughly $4 billion in the fourth quarter.

The rapid widening of Merrill's losses has led investors to wonder whether other banks and brokerages have a good grasp of their exposure to bad debt. Bank shares fell sharply yesterday, contributing to a 2.6% fall in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Merrill's shares fell $3.83, or 5.8%, to $62.19 in 4 p.m. trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

Merrill's deals have attracted the interest of some mortgage investors and specialists.

Making the Rounds

"Merrill has been making the rounds asking hedge funds to engage in one-year off-balance-sheet credit facilities," Janet Tavakoli, who consults for investors about derivatives, told clients in a recent note. "One fund claimed that Merrill was offering a floor return (set buy-back price)," she said in the note, "so this risk would return to Merrill." Ms. Tavakoli said such transactions would explain how Merrill's mortgage-related exposure dropped in the third quarter.

In recent weeks, Merrill has been scrambling to line up hedge funds to take as much as $5 billion in mortgage-related securities, people close to the situation said, part of what Merrill executives refer to as a "mitigation strategy." Under the strategy, which started earlier this year, Merrill has tried several means of lowering the risk of its exposure to mortgage-backed securities, these people say.

In accounting for such transactions, "the general guiding principle is whether the benefits and risks of ownership were transferred," says Charles Niemeier, former chief accountant for the SEC's enforcement division and now a director of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Legal questions can arise if the seller retains some exposure to the risk of the assets losing value, and if the deal is designed to disguise the picture of a business's financial health.
FROM THE ARCHIVE

• U.S. Investors Face an Age of Murky Pricing
10/12/07

Jay Gould, a securities lawyer at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, says if a firm is unloading securities from its books "without a real commercial purpose other than to create a value for pricing purposes, that can be a problem."

Other big securities firms with mortgage-related losses have arranged similar deals with hedge funds. As disclosed in a recent page-one article in The Wall Street Journal, Bear Stearns Cos. sold $1 billion of risky mortgage loans to a hedge fund under a one-year pact known as a "mandatory auction call." Bear Stearns agreed to participate in an auction for the loans that provided the hedge fund with a guaranteed minimum return.

Three big U.S. banks are assembling a group of financial institutions to create an investment pool to buy some mortgage-related securities from "structured investment vehicles" that are being forced to sell. That effort, which is backed by the Treasury Department, has also led some investors to question whether the goal is to delay the point at which banks recognize losses on troubled assets. The banks say their aim is to forestall forced selling of the assets.

In mid-July, before the credit crunch worsened, Merrill reported better-than-expected earnings with little impact from exposure to mortgage-backed securities. Asked about the firm's mortgage position on a call with analysts, Merrill Chief Financial Officer Jeff Edwards said: "Proactive aggressive risk management has put us in an exceptionally good position." Two weeks later, Mr. O'Neal personally sent an email to Merrill employees assuring them the firm had such risks well in hand.

Source of Problems

One source of problems was the First Franklin mortgage company, which Merrill bought in December 2006. First Franklin catered to subprime, or less credit-worthy, borrowers. Subprime loans have fallen sharply in value this year due to rising default rates.

Another source was Merrill's underwriting of collateralized debt obligations, which are securities backed by pools of assets including mortgages. Merrill ranked No. 1 in the area from 2004 through 2006.

By the end of June 2007, Merrill had CDO exposure of $32.1 billion and a subprime-mortgage exposure of $8.8 billion, totaling $40.9 billion. Much of the CDO exposure was in triple-A rated "super senior" slices. These were supposed to enjoy strong protection against defaults, but they began to decline steeply in price in late July.

By the end of September, Merrill says it reduced such positions through sales, hedges and write-downs to $15.2 billion of CDOs and $5.7 billion of subprime mortgages, a total of $20.9 billion. The write-downs totaled $6.9 billion for CDOs and $1 billion for subprime mortgages.